Central Eurasia Studies

Central Eurasia Studies

Measuring Iran's Trade Governance and Trade Facilitation with Central Eurasian Countries

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
2 Ph.D. in Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.
Abstract
Introduction: Iran is one of the countries that, in addition to enjoying a geopolitical position on transit routes, also has numerous neighbors. However, international sanctions and dependence on crude oil exports have created difficulties for Iranian trade. For this reason, in addition to reducing dependence on crude oil exports, Iran also aims to expand regional trade, and it has worked to mitigate the impact of these restrictions through regional trade governance.
Accordingly, the Central Eurasian region appears to be a suitable environment for achieving Iran's goals for two reasons: first, most of its countries are energy exporters, and crude oil exports cannot make a significant contribution to Iran's exports; second, the current sanctions situation for Russia has created a suitable environment for barter or dollar-free transactions. For this reason, this study examines the level of Iran's trade with Eurasian countries and the feasibility of assessing the impact of trade governance on that trade.
Research question: What are the characteristics of Iran's trade with Eurasia, and how can trade governance tools facilitate the implementation of trade agreements?
Research hypothesis: Membership, as measured by trade governance, has improved Iran's trade relations.
Methodology and theoretical framework: This study uses a time-series approach to assess the feasibility of facilitating regional trade between Iran and Eurasian countries. A time series consists of data that record the progress of an issue and allow it to be examined over time. In other words, a time series is a set of observations arranged in time and obtained by observing the phenomenon over a specific period.
Regional trade governance encompasses two types of agreements: regional trade agreements and preferential trade agreements, both of which aim to facilitate regional trade. Regional trade facilitation through trade governance is a broad and multifaceted initiative. Trade governance through regional trade facilitation proposes a highly flexible, demand-driven approach that enables the target region to expand trade opportunities among countries by identifying the region's productive capabilities.
Results and discussion: In examining the time series of Iranian exports to Eurasian countries, several points can be noted:
- Apart from Tajikistan and Turkmenistan, where Iran's best export performance occurs in the middle of the time series, in other countries, Iran's exports are best at the end of the time series, indicating an improvement in exports over the period under review.
- The growth coefficient also shows, by comparing the beginning and end of the period under review, that increases in Iranian exports to target countries in Central Eurasia are present in all countries and are very significant in some cases: exports to Georgia increased by more than 25 times, to Russia by more than 10 times, to Armenia and Kazakhstan by more than 5 times, to Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan by about 4 times, to Azerbaijan by about 2 times, and to Kyrgyzstan recorded a 100% increase, indicating the existence of a continuous market for Iranian exports in the countries under study.
Also, the trend in Iran's imports from target countries in Eurasia shows that:
- Unlike the export trend, in which more countries were in the best position at the end of the time series, only imports from three countries (Armenia, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan) were in a better position at the end of the time series, confirming the cyclical pattern in Iran's import trend.
- Contrary to the export trend, which was positive in all countries, the growth coefficient has negative values, confirming that in some countries the value of imports has even decreased compared to the beginning of the time series; this situation has been recorded in the three countries of Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, and Turkmenistan.
Conclusion: Sanctions, oil dependence, and a dollar-based economy are eroding Iran’s economic resilience. Strengthening resilience requires focusing on production and export capabilities, diversifying trade to reduce political risk, and adopting a regional approach to create synergies. Removing regional infrastructure and regulatory bottlenecks has proven effective globally. Given these trends, regional trade agreements with Eurasia (expanding from the current four countries to all Central Eurasian states) are strategically crucial. Empirical evidence shows that, despite sanctions, banking restrictions, and trade barriers, Iran’s exports to the region have increased, and imports have partially replaced Iran’s grain supply. Such agreements (bilateral or collective) would help Iran escape global isolation by gaining access to a regional market.
Keywords

فارسی
حسینی، میرعبداله و محمدرضا عابدین مقانکی و علی زاهدطلبا (1402)، «همگرایی اقتصادی- تجاری منطقه‌ای میان ایران و اتحادیۀ اقتصادی اوراسیا»، بررسی‌های بازرگانی، دوره21، شماره 122، صص. 32-1،(doi: 10.22034/bs.2023.1987778.2724)
 خادمی، غلامرضا و داوود آقایی (1400)، «ارزیابی پارلمان‌گرایی چندجانبه در همگرایی منطقه‌ای اوراسیا»، مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی، دوره14، شماره2، صص. 23-1، (doi:10.22059/jcep.2022.320811.449996).
فیروزآبادیان، مهدی و فرامرز یادگاریان (1404)، تحول مفهوم مصونیت مطلق در قوانین داخلی کشورهای اوراسیایی و ایران، مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی، دوره18، شماره2، صص. 316-289،(doi: 10.22059/jcep.2025.381215.450253).
طالب‌پور، سمیه، محمود نورانی و رضا محمدپور (1401)، «نقش اتحادیۀ اقتصادی اوراسیا در توسعه‌ تجارت خارجی ایران، پژوهش‌های جغرافیای سیاسی، دوره7، شماره1، صص. 102-79، (doi: 10.22067/pg.2021.67119.0)
عسکری ارجنکی، منصور (1400)، موافقتنامه تجارت ترجیحی بین ایران و اتحادیۀ اقتصادی اوراسیا، تهران: دریچه نور.
کرمی، نسرین، عبدالمجید جلایی اسفندآبادی و محسن زاینده‌رودی (1403)، «بررسی تأثیر اقتصاد دیجیتال کشورهای اوراسیا بر رشد اقتصادی بخش‌های اقتصادی ایران»، پژوهشنامه اقتصاد کلان، دوره19، شماره43، صص. 33-7، (doi:10.22080/mrl.2024.27051.2073)
کولائی، الهه، بهاره سازمند و ریحانه رضایی (1403)، مقدمه‌ای بر مطالعات منطقه‌ای، تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
میرفخرایی، سید حسن (1403)، «تجارت آزاد ایران و اتحادیۀ اقتصادی اوراسیا از منظر پیش‌ران‌ها و پس‌ران‌های ژئواکونومیک»، پژوهشنامه روابط جهانی، دوره 1، شماره 3، صص. 204-173، (doi:10.22054/jrgr.2024.76989.1063)
نوری، علیرضا (1398)، «ایران، روسیه و همگرایی اوراسیایی؛ منافع منطقه‌گرایی فعال»، مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی، دوره 12، شماره 2، صص. 252-235، (doi:10.22059/jcep.2019.256084.449759)
English
Barbero, Javier (2021), “Quality of Government and Regional Trade: Evidence from European Union Regions”, Regional Studies, Vol. 55, No. 7, pp. 1240–1251, (doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1873934).
Blažek, Jiří and Viktor Květoň (2025), “The Role of Regional Governance Modes and System-level Agency in Evolutionary Paths of Regional Industries”, Regional Studies, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 1-20, (doi:10.1080/00343404.2024.2435524).
Borgogno, Oscar and Michele Savini Zangrandi (2024), “Chinese Data Governance and Trade Policy: From Cyber Sovereignty to the Quest for Digital Hegemony?”, Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 33, No. 148, pp. 578–602, (doi:10.1080/10670564.2023.2299961).
Dragneva, Rilka, and Christopher A. Hartwell (2020), “The Eurasian Economic Union: Integration without Liberalization?”, Post-Communist Economies, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 200–221, (doi:10.1080/14631377.2020.1793586).
Döringer, Stefanie (2020), “Governance Entrepreneurship in Regional Economic Development: Individual Agency in Austria”, Regional Science, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 550–567, (doi:10.1080/21681376.2020.1842801).
Drieghe, Lotte (2019), “The First Lomé Convention between the EEC and ACP Group Revisited: Bringing Geopolitics Back in”, Journal of European Integration, Vol. 42, No. 6, pp. 783–798, (doi:10.1080/07036337.2019.1682566).
Hou, Yulin, Wenjun Xue, and Xin Zhang (2024), “The Impact of Geopolitical Risk on Trade Costs”, Global Economic Review, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 1–24. (doi:10.1080/1226508X.2024.2305464).
Iran Trade (2025), The Observatory of Economic Complexity, Available at: https://www.oec.world/en/visualize/stacked/hs92/irn (Accessed on: 15/8/2025).
Izotov, Vladimir and Anastassia, Obydenkova. (2020), “Geopolitical Games in Eurasian Regionalism: Ideational Interactions and Regional International Organisations”, Post-Communist Economies, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 150–174, (doi:10.1080/14631377.2020.1793584).
Khondker, Habibul Haque (2020), “Eurasian Globalization: Past and Present”, Globalizations, Vol. 18, No. 5, pp. 707–719, (doi:10.1080/14747731.2020.1842085).
Kim, Sung Eun and Joonseok Yang (2022), “Who Votes for Free Trade and When? Geopolitics as the Source of Legislative Preferences on Free Trade Agreements”, Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 2257–2284, (doi:10.1080/09692290.2022.2144927).
Klerk, Jacques de (2025), “Modelling Time Series Structure, Identifying Outliers and Forecasting ESKOM”, Studies in Economics and Econometrics, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 34–52, (doi:10.1080/03796205.2025.2458853).
Lin Shang, Han (2025), “Forecasting a Time Series of Lorenz Curves: One-way Functional Analysis of Variance”, Journal of Applied Statistics, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 1–18, (doi:10.1080/02664763.2025.2490093).
Mamba, Essotanam (2021), “Role of Governance in Open Trade Policies–Growth Nexus in ECOWAS Countries: The Use of Extended IV Approach in Panel Data”, The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 661–684, (doi:10.1080/09638199.2021.1889643).
Mekhdiev, Elnur, Elizaveta S. Sokolova, Natalia V. Toropova and Igbal A. Guliev (2023), “Eurasian Economic Union – Iran Partnership on Bilateral and Multilateral Basis: Economic and Geopolitical Aspects”, Geopolitics Quarterly,
Vol. 2, No. 19, pp. 97–107, (doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1873934).
Pizzolo, Paolo (2024), “Eurasian Ideologies at Odds, Assessing the Opposing Nature of Eurasianism and Turanism”, Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 420–437, (doi:10.1080/13537113.2024.2312603).
Stiller, Kenneth (2025), “The Changing Boundaries of Trade Governance: The Cases of the EU and the UK”, Geopolitics, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 1–17, (doi:10.1080/14650045.2025.2454907).
Su, Xiaobo and Jinping Song (2021), “Cooperative Control and the Governance of Cross-border Trade in Chinese Border Cities”, Territory, Politics, Governance, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 318–336, (doi:10.1080/21622671.2021.1993985).
Trade Exchanges between Eurasian Countries (2025), World Bank, Available at: https://www.Wits.worldbank.org/TradeFlow/Partner/by-country/Product (Accessed on: 10/8/2025).
Vinokurov, Evgeny (2020), “Interaction of Eurasian and International Financial Institutions”, Post-Communist Economies, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 265–282, (doi:10.1080/14631377.2020.1793588).
Weinhardt, Clara and Deborah Barros Leal Farias (2025), “Developing Countries in Global Trade Governance: Comparing Norms on Inequality in the WTO and GSP Schemes,” Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 1239-1265, (doi:10.1080/09692290.2025.2455504).
Wouters, Jan., and Vineet Hegde (2022), “Reform of Global Trade Governance: The Role of the European Union”, Journal of European Integration, Vol. 44, No. 5, pp. 715–730, (doi:10.1080/07036337.2022.2073446).
Yan, Dong, and Li Chunding (2021), “China and the Reform of International Trade Governance System”, Social Sciences in China, Vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 140–164, (doi:10.1080/02529203.2021.1971407).