Russia's Role in the Emergence of a New Sub-Regional Order in West Asia (2010-2024)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 Ph.D. Candidate of International Relations, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

10.22059/jcep.2025.377263.450224

Abstract

Introduction: The theoretical approach governing the organization of data and the conclusion of analyses is neo-realism, based on the components of Kent Waltz, which emphasizes the use of a system theory based on outside-in explanation to analyze trends. We also use the qualitative analysis and explanation method, which involves an approach to studying the content of data and the perceptions of experts on the topic under discussion. To examine the hypothesis, we first outline the background of the research, presenting existing analyses in this field. Then, theoretical foundations based on neo-realism are proposed. Next, Russia's role in the West Asian region and its strategic dimensions will be examined. And finally, we will discuss the strategic implications of this situation and conclude the discussions.
West Asia has long been a scene of great powers' competition, but the dynamics of regional order have undergone a significant transformation in the post-Arab Spring era. As the United States reassesses its long-standing security commitments, a vacuum has emerged vacuum increasingly filled by a rising Russia. From military intervention in Syria to sophisticated diplomatic moves to balance regional rivalries, Moscow has transformed its role from an external observer to a central power broker. This article examines how Russia's strategic actions have contributed to the formation of a new sub-regional order characterized by multipolarity, fluid alliances, and transactional partnerships. Through a comprehensive analysis of Russia's bilateral and multilateral interactions, this study aims to illuminate the drivers and constraints shaping the geopolitical landscape of West Asia.
In the post-Cold War era and the era of globalization, the transition towards emerging regional and transregional levels has increased. The complexity of cooperation and interactions among actors, as well as the multi-dimensionality of the international actors, has led to the formation of such regional arrangements. Understanding regional campaigns is one of the most crucial needs in analyzing global politics within the current international system, because it is through these campaigns that interactions at the broader international level are strengthened and, as a result, the foreign policy strategies of each actor are defined. Therefore, the main issue addressed in this article is the developments that have occurred after the Arab Spring and the Syrian civil war, where we are no longer faced with a unilateral order from the United States, and Russia is also seeking to impose and regulate an order in which it considers itself a partner.
Research question: What is Russia's role in the emergence of a new sub-regional order in West Asia?
Research hypothesis: Russia's role in the West Asia region is due to the requirements of the system, which has inevitably placed the country's foreign policy strategy on a path of influencing and playing a role in the region, thereby taking the initiative in other regions.
Methodology and Theoretical Framework: Neo-Realism accepts concepts used in classical realism, such as anarchy, power, national interests, and the distinction between domestic and international politics. However, the most important criticism of this theory is that it is reductionist. Therefore, structural realism employs the level of analysis of the international system rather than the national level of analysis to understand international politics. Waltz states that theories of international politics focus on individual or national causes, but theories that focus on international causes are systemic theories. Unlike classical realists, he separates international politics from economics, national politics, and other factors, and assigns an independent role to the international structure. The dominant paradigm of international relations is the balance of power. Therefore, a good theory of international relations explains the balance of power in all events.
Results and discussion: Given the expansion of Russia's power in recent years, the country is seeking to expand its influence using political, military, and economic tools in the West Asian region. Russia does not recognize the idea of a rules-based order promoted by the United States and the West, because the West seeks to create rules and impose them on the global community. By rejecting the post-Soviet international system and regional arrangements, Russia has sought a return to the post-World War II order. As a result, Russia finds itself caught between the powers that determine the fate of the world. They compete with each other, and mutual respect for interests and spheres of influence is the only factor that prevents this competition. This role, envisioned by the Russian leader, aims to establish a new order in West Asia that incorporates aspects of Russia's foreign policies and strategies.
Conclusion: An examination of the contexts, dimensions, and consequences of the strategic competition between Russia and the United States reveals that Russia's view of the international system is geopolitical, security, and realistic, which has turned international relations into a dangerous and unreliable environment. Despite such a tense, critical, and militarized atmosphere, Russia, due to systemic pressures, seeks to play a role in important regions such as West Asia based on the Waltzian realism envisioned by Kent Waltz. Because the strategic wisdom of the Russian elite is well aware of the dimensions of the West Asia region's capacity and position in shaping the international system and its influence in this region, which can affect the policies of actors in other regions. In fact, the attempt to maximize the power of Waltzian realism is evident in Russia's foreign policy strategy towards the region.

Keywords


فارسی
سجاد پور، محمدکاظم و فاطمه تفتیان(1391)، روابط آمریکا و روسیه در عصر نومحافظه کاران 2008- 2000؛ همکاری و تنش، پژوهش‌های بین‌المللی، دوره اول، شماره 2، صص. 73-100، قابل دسترس در:
 https://www.iisajournals.ir/article_41890.html، (تاریخ دسترسی: ۱۲/۱۲/۱۴۰۳).
کولائی، الهه و عفیفه عابدی(1397)، مؤلفه‌های ژئوپلیتیکی سیاست خارجی روسیه، فصلنامه ژئوپلیتیک، دوره 14، شماره 49، صص. 1-25،
 (doi: 20.1001.1.17354331.1397.14.49.1.7)
کولائی، الهه و دیاکو حسینی(1400)، بازخوانی نقش استثناگرایی آمریکایی در شکست سیاست ازسرگیری مناسبات میان آمریکا و روسیه، مطالعات راهبردی سیاستگذاری عمومی، دوره 11، شماره 38، صص. 112-133، قابل دسترس در :
       https://sspp.iranjournals.ir/article_245345.html، (تاریخ دسترسی: 21/03/1404).
کرمی، جهانگیر و محمدرضا سورتچی(1402)، رقابت راهبردی روسیه و آمریکا: ابعاد و پیامدهای ‌بین‌المللی، مطالعات اوراسیای مرکزی، دوره 16، شماره 1، صص. 295-317، (doi: 10.22059/jcep.2023.349654.450104)
 
English
Acharya, Amitav (2014), The End of American World Order, Cambridge: Polity.
Al Makahleh, Shehab (2018), The Arab View of Russia's Role in the MENA: Changing Arab Perceptions of Russia, and the Implications for US Policy, Russia in the Middle East, Vol. 61, No. 5, pp. 25-41, Available at: https://jamestown.org/program/arab-view-russias-role-mena-changing-arab-perceptions-russia-implications-us-policy, (Accessed on: 12/08/2024).
Blank, Stephen and Edward Levitzky (2015), Geostrategic Aims of the Russian Arms Trade in East Asia and the Middle East, Defence Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp.  63-80, Available at:
Bolton, Kerry (2018), Russia and the Fight against Globalization, London: Black House.
Brooks, Stephen and William Wohlforth (2008), World out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American primacy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Chase, Robert, Emily Hill and Paul Kennedy (1999), the Pivotal States: A New Framework for US Policy in the Developing World, NewYork: WW Norton & Company.
Cutler, Robert (2004), The Shanghai Cooperation Organization Moves into First Gear, The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 12-31, Available at: https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/8864-analytical-articles-caci-analyst-2004-3-24-art-8864, (Accessed on: 25/07/2024).
Ebert, Hannes and Daniel Flemes (2018), Regional Powers and Contested Leadership, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Erşen, Emre (2014), Rusyanın Arab Baharı Politikası, Middle East Analysis, Vol. 61, No. 15, pp. 28-45, Available at: https://www.academia.edu/6442804/Rusyan%C4%B1n_Arap_Bahar%C4%B1_Politikas%C4%B1, (Accessed on: 19/06/2024).
Flemes, Daniel (2016), Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers, London: Routledge.
Frear, Mathew and Honorata Mazepus (2021), Security, Civilisation and Modernisation: Continuity and Change in the Russian Foreign Policy Discourse, Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 73, No. 2, pp. 1-21, (doi: 10.1080/09668136.2020.1843601).
Kanet, Roger and Dina Moulioukova (2021), Russia and the World in the Putin Era: From Theory to Reality in Russian Global Strategy, New York: Routledge.
Kofman, Michael and Matthew Rojansky (2018), What Kind of Victory for Russia in Syria? Military Review, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp. 22-48, Available at: https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/Online-Exclusive/2018-OLE/Russia-in-Syria, (Accessed on: 2/05/2024).
Kotkin, Stephen (2016), “Russia's Perpetual Geopolitics: Putin Returns to the Historical Pattern”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 95, No. 3, pp. 22-40, Available at: www.boulder-wadg.org/pdfs/RussiasPerpetualGeopolitics.pdf (Accessed on: 2022/3/23).
Leichtova, Magda (2014), Misunderstanding Russia, Russian Foreign Policy and the West, Farnham: Ashgate.
Linklater, Andrew (2007), Critical Theory and World Politics, London: Routledge
Magen, Zvi (2013), Russia and the Middle East: Policy Challenges, Tel Aviv: Institute for National Security Studies.
Mearsheimer, John (2014), “Why the Ukraine Crisis is the West’s Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 93, No. 5, pp. 77–89, Available at: http://www.mearsheimer.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Why-the-Ukraine-Crisis-Is.pdf (Accessed on: 2022/3/9).
Michnik, Wojciech (2020), Russia's New Strategic Calculus in the Middle East, NDC Research Paper, Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 56-81, Available at: https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/items/eceeedc8-9e4f-45c1-b23d-7de029f34aef, (Accessed on: 13/02/2024).
Nawfal Abbas Hassan and Shamal Mustafa (2024), The Impact of Contemporary International Wars on International Security - A Case of Russia's War on Ukraine and Israel's War on Gaza, International Journal of Religion, Vol. 5, No. 11, pp. 390 – 403, (doi: https://doi.org/10.61707/vh723w24).
Roussos, Sotiris (2020), Russia, the Middle East and the International System. A Closer Look at Russia and Its Influence in the World, NewYork: Nova Science Pub Inc.
Russia National Security Strategy; 2021, Russian President's Decree, pp. 1-26,  Available at: http://static.kremlin.ru/media/events/files/ru/QZw6hSk5z9gWq0plD1ZzmR5cER0g5tZC.pdf, (Accessed on: 20/02/2025).
Smith, Nicholas (2019), A New Cold War? Assessing the Current US-Russia Relationship, Cham: Palgrave/Pivot.
Stepanova, Ekaterina (2016), “Russia in the Middle East: Back to a 'Grand Strategy' – or Enforcing Multilateralism?” Politique Etrangère, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 1-22, Available at: https://www.ifri.org/en/articles-politique-etrangere/russia-middle-east-back-grand-strategy-or-enforcing-multilateralism,(Accessed on: 20/07/2024).
Suchkov, Martin (2018), "Can Russia, China Cooperate on the Middle East?" Al- Monitor, December 12, Available at:  http://www.al- monitor.com/pulse/originals/2018/12/russia-china-cooperation-syria-middle east.html#ixzz5cVNnh YU5, (Assessed on: 12 /01/2019).
Tatar, Volkan (2018), “Russia's Middle East Policy in the Context of Post-Cold War”, The Journal of International Scientific Research, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 107–113, Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324814810_Russia's_Middle_East_Policy_in_the_context_of_Post-Cold_War, (Accessed on: 22/03/2024).
Waltz, Kenneth (1979), Theory of International Politics, London: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Zevelev, Igor (2016), Russian National Identity and Foreign Policy, Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/russian-national-identity-and-foreign-policy, (Accessed on: 10/06/2024).
Zvyagelskaya, Ivan (2013), Russia's Interests in the Middle East: A new Context, Russia and Israel in the Changing Middle East, The Institute for National Security Studies, Vol. 1, No. 129, pp. 1–45, Available at: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/172130/Memorandum129_2013.pdf (Accessed on: 21/03/2025).
Афроимович, Неймарк (2020), Эволюция Внешнеполитической Стратегии России, Москва: Проспект.
Савин, Л.В (2020), “Внешняя политика России в XXI веке: итоги двадцатилетия Многополярность и внешняя политика России”, Постсоветские исследования, Т. 3,  №. 1, pp. 9-18, (doi: 10.24411/2618-7426-2020-00001).