Foreign Policy Shift in Afghanistan during Ashraf Ghani’s Presidency: A Cognitive Approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of International Relations, Faculty of Law & Political Science, University of Tehran

2 Ph.D., Department of International Relations, Faculty of Law & Political Science, University of Tehran

Abstract

Introduction
During his tenure, the Afghan President, Mohammad Ashraf Ghani, followed a different foreign policy path than his predecessor. The shift from neutrality, as the traditional way of conducting foreign affairs in Afghanistan, to a non-neutral path characterized the foreign policy of Afghanistan during his term of office. This can be seen as a major shift that may be addressed from various points of view. This article shows how President Ghani’s perception of reality and his beliefs about an ideal foreign policy for Afghanistan led to this foreign policy shift. Cognitive mapping as a theoretical approach has been used to show how his perceptions and beliefs are related to each other to form policies. Qualitative content analysis has been used to represent his cognition. The main finding of the article is that Ghani’s pragmatic economically-driven attitude besides his understanding of peace and security for Afghanistan as a major goal being achievable through economic growth, foreign direct investments, and interdependence at regional and extra-regional levels led to his diversion from neutrality.
During his tenure, the former Afghan President, Mohammad Ashraf Ghani, followed a different foreign policy path than his predecessors. Traditionally, neutrality has been the main orientation in Afghanistan’s foreign policy. Since its independence in 1919 (except for a few years after its occupation by the Soviet forces in 1979), Afghan leaders have, more or less, almost always followed the same path. This has been true even in the post-Taleban era. Ex-President Hamed Karzai, for example, despite all external pressures, continued the same foreign policy orientation through a balanced policy towards great powers and regional powers.
However, the shift from neutrality to a non-neutral path characterized the foreign policy of Afghanistan during Ghani’s presidency. Instances of President Ghani’s new orientation can be seen in deepening and expanding relations with western powers, weakening relations with Iran and India, expanding relations with China, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates, and even supporting the Saudi-led alliance in Yemen. These changes can be regarded as unexpected foreign policy decisions as they reflect a violation of neutrality and a balance-based foreign policy dominant for decades. They can even be considered unrealistic when regional conditions are taken into account. Furthermore, they can be regarded as violating Ghani’s economic preferences as they deprived Afghanistan of some primary economic advantages.
Research Question: The question that can be raised is about the cause of such a shift. In other words: why did Afghanistan change its traditional foreign policy orientation in the form of neutrality towards a non-neutral path during Ghani’s presidency?
Research Hypothesis: The question above may be addressed from various points of view and lead to different answers. One may refer to, for example, the significance of foreign pressures, Ghani’s sense of gratitude towards his supporters during the presidential campaign, or the requirements of development. These, however, prove to be inconsistent as some aspects of the shift might be seen as contradictory.
In this paper, the significance of President Ghani’s perceptions in this regard is underlined. The hypothesis is: President Ghani’s perceptions of reality and his beliefs about an ideal foreign policy for Afghanistan led to this foreign policy shift from neutrality to non-neutrality.
Theoretical Framework and Research Method: In a country such as Afghanistan, even if structural forces impose limits on foreign policy choices, the special position of the leaders gives them important leverages. It is the president who can determine the foreign policy of the country. What leads him to his decision is his definition of the situation which is rooted in his understanding of the situation. This article aims to show how cognitive mapping as a theoretical approach can be used to explain how Ghani’s perceptions and beliefs are related to each other and how they have led to his policy choices. According to this theory, everyone has a causal explanation for every situation. In other words, decision-makers have causal claims about the reality in their minds and cognitive mapping seeks to represent the structure of their causal claims. “Cognitive mapping” reflects the arguments of the decision-maker in a graph. Although the approach is usually used to show how the decision-maker sees the relationships in what has happened in the past, we have used it to show how some causal claims have been made and act as presuppositions for reaching a policy option.
In the cognitive approach in general and in cognitive mapping theory in particular, it is believed that one’s thoughts and perceptions are reflected in one’s statements. Thus, if we gather the relevant statements and analyze them, we may get to one’s perceptions in the form of a directed graph that shows the network of concepts in their causal relationships. Content analysis, both quantitative and qualitative, is taken to be the appropriate method for cognitive approaches.
As for the research method, we have employed qualitative content analysis in order to represent President Ghani’s cognition. Accordingly, the speeches and texts produced by Ghani in various contexts are analyzed to find his way of reasoning and arguments. The result is a graph in which causal relations between concepts are demonstrated.
Findings: Ghani believes that an active foreign policy leads to Afghanistan’s interest and security and that is why we can see a proactive foreign policy in this era. To him, a developmentalist approach to foreign policy, i.e, giving priority to economic needs but also leads to security. Western powers are seen as the best partners’ security terms and hence cooperation with the members of NATO plays a vital role in providing stability and security which are seen as a precondition for attracting foreign investment. Ghani argues that an active developmentalist foreign policy leads to more opportunities in international and regional processes that are regarded to be beneficial to Afghanistan. Although western powers are given a special place in providing security, it is believed that expanding relations with China (compared to India) leads to more economic gains and security. Furthermore, he perceives that expanding relations with Saudi Arabia and Persian Gulf Arab states leads to more security as well as more financial aid.
Conclusion: Thus, the main finding of the article is that Ghani’s pragmatic economically-driven attitude besides his understanding of peace and security for Afghanistan as a major goal being achievable through economic growth, foreign direct investments, and interdependence at regional and extra-regional levels led to his diversion from the traditional orientation of neutrality.

Keywords


Abbasi, Ibrahim and Majid Ranjbardar (2011), “Iran’s Financial Aids to Afghanistan: its Goals and Economic Effects”, Foreign Relations Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 3, Fall 2011, pp. 195-229, [in Persian]. http://frqjournal.csr.ir/article_123566.html#ar_ info_pnl_cite
Abed, Ahmad Zia (2019), “US Competition with Iran and Increasing Insecurity in Afghanistan from 2001 to 2014”, Journal of Diplomacy and International Studies, Vol. 4, No. 11, Spring 2019, pp. 61-89, [in Persian].
Ashraf Ghani, Mohammad (2013), National Program and the Prospect of the Decade of Change, Kabul: Transformation and continuity campaign, [in Persian].
Ashraf Ghani, Mohammad (2018), Statements by President Ghani (Collection of Statements by President Mohammad Ashraf Ghani), first volume, Kabul: Press department office the president, [in Persian].
Atai, Farhad and Zangeneh, Somaye (2020), “Evolution of Priorities in Shanghai Cooperation Organization since its Establishment up to 2019”, Journal of Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 13, No. 1, Spring & Summer 2020, pp. 143-160 [in Persian]. https://dx.doi.org/ 10.22059/jcep.2020. 287851.449867
Axelrod, Robert (1976), Structure of Decision, The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites, New Jersey, Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/ 10.1515/ 9781400871957
Andisha, Nasir A. (2015), “Neutrality in Afghanistan’s Foreign Policy”, SPECIAL REPORT 360 in The United States Institute of Peace, (Accessed on: 9 February 2018), available at: https://www.usip.org/sites/ default/files/SR360-Neutrality-in-Afghanistan's-Foreign-Policy.pdf
Bahrami, Mohammad Reza (2019), “Events in Afghanistan after September 11 and its Impact on Iran; The Illusion of Victory”, Hamshahri -e- Diplomatic, New Vol, No. 44, October 2010, pp. 47-55, [in Persian].
Chegnizadeh, Gholamali (2018), The Perception of Afghan Elites about Iran, Kabul, Institute of Afghanistan’s Strategic Studies [in Persian].
FatemiNejad, Sayed Ahmad and MohammadZade, Alireza (2018), “The Role of New Afghanistan in Regional Security Complex: From Central Asia into South of Asia”, Journal of Central Eurasia Studies, Autumn & Winter 2018, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 399-416 [in Persian]. https://dx.doi.org/10.22059/jcep.2019.216523.449668
Gregorian, Vartan (2009), The Emergence of Modern Afghanistan; Politics of Reform and Modernization, Tehran, Erfan Publication, [in Persian].
Heradstveit, Daniel and G. Matthew Bonham (1986), “Decision Making in the Face of Uncertainty: Attributions of Norwegian and American Officials”, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 339-356. https://doi.org/10.1177%2 F002234338602300404
Hadian, H. (2009), “The Structural Weakness of Nation-State Building in Afghanistan”, Strategic Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 51, pp. 133-151. https://www. sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx? id=209977
Hopkins, B. D. (2008), The Making of Modern Afghanistan, London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743809990717.
Holsty, El. Radolf (2017), Content Analysis in Social and Human Sciences, Translated by Nader Salarzadeh Amiri, Tehran: Allameh Tabatabaie Press, [in Persian].
Jafari, Mohammad Musa and Molaei, Alisajjad (2018), The Balance of Threat Between Iran And Saudi Arabia and National Unity Government”, Quarterly Journal of Contemporary Perspective on Foreign Policy and International Relations, Vol. 1, No. 2, Winter 2018: pp. 163-190, [in Persian].
Kavra, viny (2018), “Afghanistan-India relations in the era of Narendra Modi and Ghani”, Quarterly Journal of Contemporary Perspective on Foreign Policy and International Relations, translated by Sharif Hozuri, Vol. 1, No. 2, Winter 2018: pp. 139-162, [in Persian].
Khalilzad, Zolmai. (1996), “Afghanistan in 1995: Civil War and a Mini-Great Game”, Asian Survey, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 190-195. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 2645816
Kozak, Christopher (2017), “The Strategic Convergence of Russia and Iran”, (Accessed on: 23 February 2019) Available at: https://criticalthreats.org/ analysis/the-strategic-convergenceof-russia-and-iran. 
Maykut, Pamela & Richard Morehouse (1995), Beginning Qualitative Research, London and New York: The Falmer Press.
Mojadadi, Najibullah (2018), The National Unity Government’s Foreign policy toward Kazakhstan based on Rosenau’s Linkage Theory”, Journal of Strategic Studies, No. 41 & 42, pp. 49-71, [in Persian].
Moshirzadeh, Homeira (2017), Theoretical Foundations of Foreign Policy Explanation and Analysis, Tehran: samt publication, [in Persian].
Morelli, Vincent, Belkin, Paul (2009), NATO in Afghanistan: A Test of the Transatlantic Alliance, Congressional Research Service. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.11610/Connections.06.3.02
Milani, Mohsen.M (2006), “Iran's Policy towards Afghanistan”, The Middle East Journal, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 235-256. http://www.jstor.org/stable/ 4330248
Sajjadi, Abdolqaium (2018), Afghanistan’s Foreign Policy, Kabul: Press of Khatam-ul-Nabiein University.
Saikal, Amin (2006), Modern Afghanistan: A History of Struggle and Survival, London: I. B. Tauris.
Salahi, Ahmadzobair et al (2017), “The Analiyzing of Afghanistan’s Foreign Policy in Ashraf Ghani’s era”, Journal of Diplomacy and International Studies, Vol. 2, No. 5, Autumn 2017, pp. 7-34, [in Persian].
 Schafer, Mark and Stephen G. Walker (2006), Beliefs and Leadership in World Politics: Methods and Applications of Operational Code Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/ 9781403983497
Shafaq Khavati, Mohammad (2018), “Mutual Suicide Revisionism in Three Neighbours Relation”, Quarterly Journal of Contemporary Perspective on Foreign Policy and International Relations, Vol. 1, No. 1, Autumn 2018: pp 119-164, [in Persian].
Sinaei, Vahid and Yousof-Zehi, Naser (2018), “Inquiry of the situation of Afghanistan’s economic development in democratic era (2001-2017)”, Journal of Central Eurasia Studies, Autumn & Winter 2018, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 345-363 [in Persian].  https://dx.doi.org/10.22059/jcep. 2019.264648.449788
Spanta, Rangin Dadfar (2009), Afghanistan’s Foreign Policy at the beginning of 21 Century: Interviews and Press Conferences, By Abdolghafour Arezoo, Kabul: The Publication of Afghanistan’s Foreign Ministry.
Spanta, Rangin Dadfar (2017), Afghanistan’s Policy: Narrative from Inside, Two-volume course, Kabul: Azem Publication, [in Persian].
Stanekzai, Mohammad Masoom. (2009), “Dilemmas of State Building in Afghanistan”, World Bank Institute, Development Outreach, (Accessed on: 3 February 2021) Available at: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https:// openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/4588/deor_11_2_36.pdf%3Fsequence%3D1&ved=2ahUKEwiE85ftos7uAhUB7aQKHZakDT4QFjAAegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw2m8Di_OywitCao5NJcUSfO
Tamanna, Faramarz et al (2014), Afghanistan’s Foreign Policy in the Sphere of Regional Cooperations, Kabul: Center of Stretegic Studies of Afghanistan’s Foreign Ministry.
Weber, R. (1991), Basic Content Analysis, London, California and New Dehli: Sage Publications. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412983488.
Tolouei, Hadi and Shafieefar, Mohammad (2018), “Iran’s Smart Power Analysis in Afghanistan after the US-led Invasion in 2001”, Journal of Central Eurasia Studies, , Spring & Summer 2018, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 137-155 [in Persian]. https://dx.doi.org/10.22059/jcep.2019.132667. 449605
Vatanyar, Mohammad Naser (2018), Post-Taliban Afghanistan’s Foreign Policy, Kabul: Parand pulication, [in Persian].
Young, M. and M. Schafer (1998), “Is There Method in Our Madness? Ways of Assessing Cognition in International Relations, Mershon International Studies Review. Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 63-96. https://doi.org/10.2307/254444
Young, Michael and Mark Scheafer (2017), “Ways of Assessing Cognition in International Relations”, Translated by Homeira Moshirzadeh, in Articles on Cognitive Approach in Foreign Policy Analysis, collection and translation by Homeira Moshirzadeh and Shayan Afrasiabi, Tehran: Mizan publication. 2017, [in Persian].