The Nord Stream 2 Project and the Interests of Germany, Russia, the European Union and the United States

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor of International Relations, Faculty of Administrative Sciences & Economics, University of Isfahan

2 Ph.D. in International Relations, Faculty of Administrative Sciences & Economics, University of Isfahan

Abstract

Introduction: Energy security is a high priority for Germany as an industrialized country and any disruption in this issue will severely damage the country's economic strength and security. Russia's conflicts with Eastern European states, the European Union and NATO since the collapse of the Soviet Union have made it clear to Germany that energy security is fragile given the high potential for conflict between the two sides. Therefore, in response to the concern that in case of any disruption in the transmission of Russian natural gas by the countries of Ukraine, Belarus and Poland to the countries of the European Union, how to supply the energy needed by the members of this union caused the German government to sign the Nord Stream 2 project with Russia despite serious opposition of some members of the European Union and the United States. This project is supposed to transfer Russian gas through the Baltic Sea from the port city of Ust-Luga to the port city of Greifswald in Germany through two pipelines for a distance of more than 1200 km. The capacity of these pipelines is about 55 billion cubic meters of gas per year. This pipeline, along with the Nord Stream 1 pipeline alone, can supply 110 billion cubic meters of gas needed by Europe, which constitutes a large part of Europe's gas imports from Russia. The Nord Stream 2 project, which was halted and ultimately sanctioned due to Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, was supposed to transport Russian gas directly to Germany without any intermediaries but due to the impact it could have on the security and interests of some members of the European Union and the United States, it caused us to see conflicts of interest between some European Union countries with Germany and Russia, Germany and the United States, and between Russia and the United States.
Research Question: What is the reason for the support of Germany and Russia, as well as the opposition of some members of the European Union and the United States to the Nord Stream 2 project?
Research Hypothesis: The research hypothesis is based on the different effects that the Nord Stream 2 project can have on the interests and security of Germany, Russia, some members of the European Union and the United States which has caused the support of Germany, Russia and also the opposition of some members of the European Union and the United States to the Nord Stream 2 project.
Theoretical Framework and Research Method: To answer the research question and test the hypothesis, the authors have used the qualitative method of multiple case studies to analyze the impact of the Nord Stream 2 project on the national security and interests of Germany, Russia, the United States and some members of the European Union. The data collection was also done in a library method and documents were collected as one of the methods of information collection and they were monitored using multiple case studies. In this way, at first the data was collected by referring to the sources related to the topic using note-taking tools and then the collected data was analyzed with a descriptive-analytical approach in the conceptual framework of Neo-realism theory and in this way, it has been tried to test the research hypothesis and answer the research question.
Results and Discussion: The results obtained from this article indicate that ensuring Germany's energy security in light of Russia's conflicts with the countries of the Eastern European region, the European Union and NATO, promoting Germany's centrality in the field of energy and converting it into a political and economic center of energy in the European Union, Stabilizing Germany's position and political and economic influence in Russia and eliminating fluctuations in the final gas transit price is one of the main reasons for Germany's support for this project. Diversification of energy transfer policy from Russia to Europe due to the high capacity of non-transit energy transfer from third countries to Germany, gain enormous revenues from gas exports in light of Russia's dependence on oil and gas revenues and the Provide Russia with a powerful tool to counter the anti-Russian policies of Eastern European countries, as well as the United States and Western institutions are the main reasons of Russian’s support for the Nord Stream 2project.
On the other hand, the European Union's greater dependence on Russian energy, concern about Russia's instrumental use of this project, deprivation of income from gas transit, ignoring the essential role of Poland and Ukraine in transferring Russian gas to Europe and removing their leverage over Russia, the impact of this project on the US sanctions and goals against Russia and the economic interests of this country in the European energy market is the main reason why some members of the European Union, especially Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and the United States, oppose the Nord Stream 2 project.
Conclusion: In this article, using the propositions of the neorealist approach, we examined the interests of Germany, Russia, the European Union, and the United States in relation to the Nord Stream 2 project and the reasons for their support and opposition to this project. According to Neo-realist statements, due to the anarchic structure of the international system, governments seek to increase their power in various ways to achieve their national interests. At the top of national interests is survival and security and any strategy that can achieve this in the best way will be the priority of countries' foreign policy. Therefore, according to the results of this article, countries such as Germany, Russia, some members of the European Union and the United States have a realistic view of the Nord Stream 2 project and considering the effects that this project can have on the security and national interests of these countries, Germany and Russia have supported this project and some members of the European Union and the United States have opposed it.

Keywords


Adomeit, Hannes. (2016), “Germany, the EU, and Russia: The Conflict over Nord Stream 2”, Centre for European Studies Policy Brief, No. 1, pp. 1-12, Available at: https://www.carleton.ca/ces/wp-content/uploads/Adomeit-policy-brief.pdf, (Accessed on: 9/12/2022).
Bäuml, Georg (2016), Russland Verstehen? Eine Theoriegeleitete Analyse der Krim-Annexion Durch Russland, Munchen, Maximilians Universitat Munchen, (Doctoral Dissertation).
Bernhardt, Thomas (2019), German Foreign Economic Policy in the Tension Field of East and West: The Case of the Nord Stream 2 Gas Pipeline, Siegburg, Josef Eul Verlag Gmbh.
Casin, Mesut Hakkı and Sina Kisacik. (2021), “Understanding the New Russian Energy Policy after the Crimean Crisis: A Case Study on Turk Stream, Power of Siberia, and Nord Stream 2 Natural Gas Projects” UPA Strategic Affairs, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 206-255, Available at: https://www.dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/upa/issue/ 60728/899034, (Accessed on: 9/12/2022).
Chuvychkina, Inna (2017), Perpektiven des Energiedialoges EU-Russlands: eine Wissenschaftliche Szenarioanalyse, Bremen, Universität Bremen, (Doctoral Dissertation).
Dehghani Firouzabadi, Seyed Jalal (2012), “Neo-Realism and Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran” ‎, Journal of Foreign Policy, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 31-54, Available at: http://fp.ipisjournals.ir/article_9333.html (Accessed on: 23/7/ 2022), [in Persian].
Domingues, Bennett (2010). Western Values and the Russian Energy Weapon, Washington, Georgetown University, (Doctoral Dissertation).
Dougherty, James and Robert Pfaltzgraff (2010), Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey, Translated by: Bozorgi and Tayyeb, Tehran, Ghoomes, [in Persian].
Elliott, Stuart (2019), “IEA Cuts 2040 EU Gas Demand Forecast by Further 22 Bcm”, Available at: https://www.spglobal.com/platts/en/market-insights/latest-news/natural-gas/111319-iea-cuts-2040-eu-gas-demand-forecast-by-further-22-bcm, (Accessed on: 8/11/2021).
Eser, Patrick, Chokani, Nahid and Reza Abhari (2019), “Impact of Nord Stream 2 and LNG on Gas Trade and Security of Supply in the European Gas Network of 2030. Applied energy, Vol. 238, pp. 816-830, (doi: j.apenergy.2019.01.068).
European Commission (2020), “Quarterly Report on European Gas Markets”, Available at: https://www.ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/default/files/documents/ quarterly_report_on_european_gas_markets_q2_2020.pdf (Accessed on: 8/9/ 2021).
European Commission (2021), “Quarterly Report on European Gas Markets”, Available at: https://www.ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/default/files/quarterly_ report_on_european_gas_markets_q4_2021_final.pdf (Accessed on: 6/2/2022).
European Parliament (2019), “Gas Imports: New Rules for Pipelines from Non-EU Countries”, Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/ economy/20190328STO33742/gas-imports-new-rules-for-pipelines-from-non-eu-countries (Accessed on: 8/13/2021).
Farajirad, Abdolreza and Roohollah Salehi Dolatabad (2017), “The Importance of Energy Role on Russian's Foreign Policy”, Central Asia and the Caucasus journal, Vol. 23, No. 98, pp. 33-66, Available at: http://www.ca.ipisjournals.ir/ article_28045.html (Accessed on: 7/26/2022), [in Persian].
Frank, Anna (2019), Deutschlands Versorgung mit Energieressourcen und die Bedeutung Russlands beim Energiehandel mit Europa: Entwicklung Theoretischer Ansätze und Kooperationsperspektiven, München, GRIN Verlag.
Gazprom (2021), “Nord Stream 2”, Available at: https://www.gazprom.com/ projects/nord-stream2/, (Accessed on: 8/18/2021).
Gehnen, Hendrik (2008) Die Nord Stream Pipeline: Politisches Instrument oder Interkonnektor?, Oslo, Universität Oslo,  (Master's Thesis).
Götz, Roland (2017), “Analyse: die Zukunft des Ukrainischen Gastransmissionssystems”, Available at: http://www.bpb.de/internationales/ europa/ukraine/258831/analyse-die-zukunft-des-ukrainischen-gastransmissionssystems (Accessed on: 8/15/2021).
Guliyev, Farid (2020), “Trump’s “America First” Energy Policy, Contingency and the Reconfiguration of the Global Energy Order”, Energy policy, Vol. 140, No. 111435, pp. 1-10, (doi: j.enpol.2020.111435).
Hasanov, Samir (2019), Außenpolitische Herausforderungen Russlands nach der Sowjetära. In Imperiales Erbe? (pp. 31-45), Wiesbaden, Springer VS.
Herold, Sebastian (2018), “Gefangen? Abhängigkeiten in der Deutsch-Russischen Gasbeziehung - Stand und Perspektive (Captured? Dependencies in German-Russian Gas Relations - Status Quo and Perspectives)“, Hochschule Darmstadt, No. 3, pp. 1-15, (doi: ssrn.3256851).
Isna News (2021), “Completion of Construction of Nord Stream 2 Gas Pipeline from Russia to Germany”, Available at: https://www.isna.ir/news/ 1400061913961 (Accessed on: 6/2/2022), [in Persian].
Karkhiran Khozani, Khosrow, Vosoughi, Saeed and Shahrouz Ebrahimi (2021), “The Nature of Interrelations between Germany and the Russian Federation on Central Asia”, Central Asia and The Caucasus Studies, Vol. 27, No. 113, pp. 61-84, Available at: http://www.ca.ipisjournals.ir/article_244896.html (Accessed on: 2/8/2022), [in Persian].
Lohmann, Sascha and Kirsten Westphal (2019), “US-Russland-Politik Trifft Europäische Energieversorgung: die Folgen Unilateraler Sanktionen und Wachsender Marktkonkurrenz”, SWP-Aktuell. No. 1, pp. 1-8, (doi: 10.18449/ 2019A01)
Łoskot-Strachota, Agata., Bajczuk, Rafał and Szymon Kardaś (2018), “Nord Stream 2 Divides the West-America’s Tough Game Against Nord Stream 2” Policy Commons, No. 1, pp. 1-10, Available at: https://www.policycommons.net/ artifacts/2264577/nord-stream-2-divides-the-west/3023631/, (Accessed on: 9/11/ 2022).
Łoskot-Strachota, Agata., Bajczuk, Rafał and Szymon Kardaś (2018), “Nord Stream 2 Divides the West”, Centre for Eastern Studies-OSW-Commentary, No. 273, pp. 1-10, Available at: https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/ 2018-06-18/nord-stream-2-divides-west, (Accessed on: 9/11/2022).
Luhmann, Hans (2020), “Nord Stream 2: Wirtschaftskrieg der USA?”, Available at: https://www.wirtschaftsdienst.eu/inhalt/jahr/2020/heft/8/beitrag/nord-stream-2-wirtschaftskrieg-der-usa.html (Accessed on: 8/12/2021).
Moshirzadeh, Homeira (2011), Development in International Relations Theories, Tehran, SAMT, [in Persian].
Müller, Graff and Christian Peter (2017), Die Beziehungen zwischen der EU und Russland: Spannung und Kooperation, Baden – Baden, Verlag Nomos.
Newnham, Randall (2011), “Oil, Carrots, and Sticks: Russia's Energy Resources as a Foreign Policy Tool”, Journal of Eurasian Studies, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 134-143, (doi: j.euras.2011.03.004).
Nikiforov, Autoren and Gunter Hackemesser (2018), Die Schlacht um Europas Gasmarkt, Heidelberg, Springer Verlag.
Rumer, Eugene (2018), “Opposition to Nord Stream 2 Makes No Sense for America or Europe”, Available at: https://www.carnegieendowment.org/2018/08/12/ opposition-to-nord-stream-2-makes-no-sense-for-america-or-europe-pub-77038, (Accessed on: 8/13/2021).
Sabbaghian, Ali and Roya Rasoolii (2021), “Stability Analysis of Russia-EU Energy Relations after the Ukraine Crisis from Perspective of the Interdependence Theory”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 177-201, (doi: JCEP. 2020.280927.449842), [in Persian].
Shaffer, Brenda (2013), “Natural Gas Supply Stability and Foreign Policy”, Energy Policy, No. 56, pp. 114-125, (doi: j.enpol.2012.11.035).
Shirkhani, Mohammad Ali and Akbar Mehdizadeh (2009), “Pragmatism in Foreign Policy and Development of Iran-China Economic Relations (1979 – 1999)”, Politics Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 201-226, Available at: https://www.jpq.ut.ac.ir/article_27711.html (Accessed on: 29/7/2022), [in Persian].
Shirkhani, Mohammad Ali and Hamed Mohajerpour (2013), “Realism and the Role of Energy Sources in Foreign Policy”, Journal of Political and International Research, Vol. 4, No. 13, pp. 1-41, Available at: http://www.pir.iaush.ac.ir/ article_554890.html?lang=fa (Accessed on: 6/8/2022), [in Persian].
Siddi, Marco (2020), “Theorising Conflict and Cooperation in EU-Russia Energy Relations: Ideas, Identities and Material Factors in the Nord Stream 2 Debate”, East European Politics, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 544-563, (doi: 21599165.2019. 1700955).
Sodaei, Ali. (2022), “Will the US Replace Russia in the European Gas Market?”, Available at: https://www.bbc.com/persian/business-60873009 (Accessed on: 21/4/2022), [in Persian].
Sydoruk, Tetiana, Stepanets, Pavlo and Iryna Tymei-chuk (2019), “Nord Stream 2 as a Threat to National Interests of Poland and Ukraine. Studia Politica”, Romanian Political Science Review, Vol. 19, No. 3-4, pp. 467-490, Available at: https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/68455 (Accessed on: 13/8/ 2022).
Sziklai, Balázs., Kóczy, László and Dávid Csercsik (2020), “The Impact of Nord Stream 2 on the European Gas Market Bargaining Positions”, Energy Policy, Vol. 144, No. 111692, pp. 1-14, (doi: j.enpol.2020.111692).
Szymanski, Konrad (2016), “Russia’s Gas Pipeline Threatens European Unity” Financial Times, Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/25a17928-96c3-11e6-a1dc-bdf38d484582, (Accessed on: 8/28/2021).
The Economist (2021), “Why Nord Stream 2 is the World’s Most Controversial Energy Project”, Available at: https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2021/07/14/why-nord-stream-2-is-the-worlds-most-controversial-energy-project (Accessed on: 8/19/2021).
Trump, Donald (2018), “Trump lashes out at Nord Stream 2, Says Germany is “Totally Controlled” by Russia”, Available at: https://www.cleanenergywire.org/ news/trump-lashes-out-german-russian-gas-trade/trump-lashes-out-nord-stream-2-says-germany-totally-controlled-russia, (Accessed on: 8/18/2021).
Waltz, Kenneth (2015), Theory of International Politics, Translated by: Talebi Arani, Tehran, Mokhatab Publication, [in Persian].
Yafimava, Katja (2015), “European Energy Security and the Role of Russian Gas: Assessing the Feasibility and the Rationale of Reducing Dependence”, Available at: http://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iaiwp1554.pdf, (Accessed on: 8/20/2021).