The Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran towards Kyrgyzstan, Current Strategies, Future Scenarios

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Regional Studies Department, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Ph.D. in International Relations, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran

10.22059/jcep.2024.371853.450197

Abstract

Introduction: Foreign policy is a complex subject in the field of international relations, which is included in the sub-branch of "foreign policy analysis". It is strongly influenced by both domestic and international factors. The decision-making process for foreign policy requires careful consideration of domestic and foreign considerations. Therefore, it is important to use theories and models to analyze and review the foreign policies of countries, considering the internal and external environments. The collapse of the Soviet Union and the formation of new republics created a competitive atmosphere in Central Asia. The Islamic Republic of Iran has been active in the current developments in Central Asia and was one of the first countries to officially recognize the independence of Kyrgyzstan on December 21, 1991. Through bilateral relations and regional cooperation, Iran has tried to strengthen cooperation with Kyrgyzstan in various fields, including politics, economics, culture, science and technology. To achieve this goal, Iran has adopted various foreign policy strategies towards the Kyrgyz Republic. The purpose of this research is to analyze the current foreign policy strategies of the Islamic Republic of Iran towards Kyrgyzstan and to present potential scenarios for Iran’s foreign policy in this country.
Research question: The purpose of this research is to answer the following questions: What is Iran's foreign policy strategy in Kyrgyzstan? What are the strengths and weaknesses of these strategies?
Research hypothesis: The proposed hypothesis is that Iran's foreign policy strategies towards Kyrgyzstan have not been successful and dynamic due to the country's internal strengths and environmental opportunities. Methodology: The current research has been carried out with the aim of analyzing the present and past strategies of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Kyrgyzstan by compiling a conceptual model influenced by approaches of foreign policy analysis and its governing principles.  This will be followed by a forward-looking approach to create potential and favorable scenarios for the Islamic Republic of Iran in this country. The research conceptual model will include two strategic management models, namely Swat and Postel, as research techniques. The research approach will be a "futuristic" approach with focusing on scenarios. The main advantage of this conceptual model is its ability to simultaneously consider the micro, macro and moderate levels and at the same time use a prospective approach to analyze the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Kyrgyzstan.
Results and discussion: Based on the drivers, trends, events and images, the following scenarios can be envisioned for Iran's foreign policy in Kyrgyzstan: the first scenario: the o-surprise scenario: possible revision: One of the most likely scenarios of Iran's foreign policy in Kyrgyzstan is the continuation of current trends without major changes. This scenario is included in the category of "static" scenarios and involves maintaining the current level of bilateral relations.The second scenario can be called "the most likely optimal" or the optimistic scenario: This scenario predicts that with the implementation of a ten-year comprehensive agreement between the two countries and the exploitation of many mines, the country’s  tourism and hydropower  potential will increase, strengthening the  communication corridors, the benefits of the country's membership in the Eurasian Economic Union ( EEU ) in relation to Iran as well as Iran's permanent membership in the Shanghai organization, the political, economic and cultural relations between the two countries will be promoted to the favorable level.
The third scenario: "The worst scenario" or pessimistic scenario: Given that currently Iran's relations with all countries of the Central Asian region, including Kyrgyzstan, are not at a favorable level compared to the strengths and the opportunities of the region, the possible unfavorable scenario is the continuation of this process along with the weakening of this relationship due to reasons including the strong presence of China and other competing countries. "Desirable" or "miracle" scenarios: The lifting of sanctions against Iran, the establishment of normal relations with the international community and permanent membership of Iran in the Shanghai Organization will have a significant impact on Iran's global influence as well as the region and the country of Kyrgyzstan. This greatly enhance the overall level of relationship between all parties involved.
Conclusion: The examination of Iran's foreign policy in Kyrgyzstan shows that while political and cultural relations between the two countries have been positive and friendly, the economic relations have been limited and at a low level. Based on the Swot and Pestel model, Iran's political strategy in Kyrgyzstan was offensive, with a defensive economic strategy and a focus on cultural diversity. Various scenarios can be analyzed for the future of relations between the two countries, including optimistic scenarios, but other possible scenarios should also be considered. Finally, the research hypothesis can be confirmed that despite having strengths and opportunities, the two countries still have a long way to achieve an ideal relationship due to weaknesses and environmental challenges.

Keywords


Akrami, Rostam (2012), “A Comparative Study of the Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran Towards the Independent Muslim Republics in Central Asia and the Caucasus in the Governments of Mr. Khatami and Ahmadinejad”, Thesis Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran, [in Persian].
Benzaghta, Mostafa Ali, Abdulaziz Elwalda and Mousa Mohamed (2021), “SWOT Analysis Applications: An Integrative literature Review”, Journal of Global Business Insights, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 54-72, (doi.org/10.5038/2640-6489.6.1.1148).
Bojadjievska, Danevska (2022), “The Importance of Scenario Planning Functions for Company’s Performance in the Contemporary Environment”, In Traders International Trade Academic Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp.173-193, (doi: 10.55065/intraders.1143265).
Chen, Shu-Hsiang, Jaitip Nasongkhla, and Ana Donaldson (2018), “A Strategic Planning Process Model for Developing Open Educational Resources”, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 362-368, (Doi:10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.5.1064).
Cholpon, Kainazarova (2018), “New Trends in Kyrgyz Foreign Policy”, International Alatoo University in Kyrgyzstan, Available at: http:// New Trends in Kyrgyz Foreign Policy - Munich Personal RePEc Archive (uni-muenchen.de), (Accessed on: 23/05/2023).
Dalton, Jeff (2018), SWOT Analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats Analysis), Great Big Agile, Apress, Berkeley, CA, (doi :10.1007/978-1-4842-4206-3_62).
Daman Pak Jami, Morteza (2023), Economic Diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Central Asia, Tehran: Publications of the Center for Political and International Studies of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, [in Persian].
Dehshiri, Mohammad Reza, and Mehdi Taheri (2016), “Educational Diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Central Asia”, ‍Central Asia and The Caucasus Journal, Vol. 28, No. 119, pp. 42-1, Available at: http://ca.ipisjournals.ir/article_24260.html, (Accessed on: 11/06/2024),  [in Persian].
Fornasiero, Rosanna, Saskia Sardesai and Ana Cristina Barros (2021), Next Generation Supply Chains: A Roadmap for Research and Innovation, Switzerland: Cham, (doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63505-3).
Garbuzarova, Elena  (2020), “Iran’s Soft Power Tools in Kyrgyzstan”, Rudn Journal of Political Science, Vol. 22, No.  1, pp. 22-31, (doi:10.22363/2313-1438-2020-22-1-22-31).
Kapur, Radhika (2020), “Meaning and Significance of Culture”, Available at: http:// Meaning and Significance of Culture (Researchgate.net), (Accessed on: 23/05/2023).
Karami, Jahangir and Tahereh Daliran Chapeshloo (2016), “NGOs and Political Transformation in Central Asia (Case Study: Color Revolution in Republic of Kyrgyzstan), Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1, 95-114, (doi: 10.22059/jcep.2016.58575), [in Persian].
Kiani, Davood (2014), “Iran and Central Asia: A Cultural Perspective”, Iranian Review of Foreign Affairs, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 113-138, Available at: https://irfajournal.csr.ir/issue_16567_16951.html?lang=fa, (Accessed on: 11/06/2024), [in Persian].
Koolaee, Elaheh (2012), Politics and Government in Central Asia, Tehran: SAMT, [in Persian].
Kosow, Hannah and Robert Gabner (2008), “Methods of Future and Scenario Analysis Overview, Assessment, and Selection Criteria”, Bonn, Deutsches Institut for Entwicklungspolitik, Available at: https://www.idos-research.de/uploads/media/Studies_39.2008.pdf, (Accessed on: 23/05/2023).
Kreibich, Rolf (2007), “Understanding of Science and Methodology of Future Research”, Journal for Semiotics, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 177-198, (Doi:10.2139/ssrn.2094215).
Mobini Dehkordi, Ali Salmanpour and Majid Khoei (2006), “Introduction to Strategic and Operational Planning”, Progressive Development, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 18, Available at: SID. https://sid.ir/paper/489572/fa, [in Persian].
Salavarzi Zadeh, Saleh, Saeed Vosoughi, Mohamad Ali Basiri and Enayatollah Yazdani (2020), “The Pathology of the "Futuristic" Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Tajikistan Using SWOT and Pestel Models”, International Relations Research, Vol. 10, No.1, pp. 35-64, Available at: https://www.iisajournals.ir/article_111957.html, (Accessed on: 23/05/2023), [in Persian].
Sanaei, Mehdi (2011), Iran-Central Asian Relations: Trends and Prospects, Tehran: Department of Political and International Studies,  [in Persian].
Sanchez, Aurora, Nicoleta Cancelas and Beatriz Molina Serrano (2020), “Analysis of Port Sustainability Using the PPSC Methodology (PESTEL, Porter, SWOT, CAME)”, World Scientific News, Vol. 9, No. 146, pp. 121-138, Available at: https://agro.icm.edu.pl/agro/element/bwmeta1.element.agro-26f002f7-cfba-426a-8e63-ff90d3aa7be9, (Accessed on: 11/06/2024). 
Sari, Yaşar (2017), “Foreign Policy of Kyrgyzstan under Askar Akayev and Kurmanbek Bakiyev”, Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 131-150, Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338487277_Foreign_Policy_of_Kyrgyzstan_Under_Askar_Akayev_and_Kurmanbek_Bakiyev, (Accessed on: 11/06/2024). 
Satarova, Eliana (2022),” Iran’s Foreign Policy towards Central Asia: The Case of Kyrgyzstan”, Post-Soviet Issues, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 183-190, (doi: 10.24975/2313-8920-2022-9-2-183-190), (in Russ).
Tavalaei, Ruhollah (2015), “Futures Study of Iran’s Cyberspace Services Trends in the Technological Process of Globalization Using Delphi Method”, Strategic Studies of Public Policy, Vol. 5, No. 17, pp. 92-123, Available at: https://sspp.iranjournals.ir/article_12743.html, (Accessed on: 11/06/2024), [in Persian].
Wallace, Vladyslav and Alejandro Rodriguez (2024), “Kyrgyzstan in Crisis: A Geopolitical Juncture”, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Available at: https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/kyrgyzstan-crisis-geopolitical-juncture, (Accessed on: 11/06/2024).
Wastnidge, Edward (2017), “Central Asia in the Iranian Geopolitical Imagination”, Cambridge Journal of Eurasian Studies, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 124-138, (doi: 10.22261/1YRJ04).
Ziba Kalam, Sadegh, Davod Afshary and Mohammad Karim Zadeh (2011), “A Study on the Reasons for Failure of the Government Emerged from the Developments Known as Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 4, No. 7, pp. 27-49, Available at: sid.ir/paper/151201/fa, (Accessed on: 11/06/2024), [in Persian].