Iran’s Policy towards Kyrgyzstan; Current Strategies, Future Scenarios

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Regional Studies Department, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Ph.D. in International Relations, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran

10.22059/jcep.2024.371853.450197

Abstract

Introduction: Foreign policy is a complex subject within the field of international relations, specifically falling under the branch of  foreign policy analysis. It is heavily influenced by both domestic and international factors. The decision-making process for foreign policy involves a careful consideration of both domestic and foreign considerations. Therefore, it is important to use theories and models to analyze and examine the foreign policies of countries, taking into account both internal and external environments. The collapse of the Soviet Union and the formation of new republics created a competitive environment in Central Asia. The Islamic Republic of Iran has been actively involved in the ongoing developments in Central Asia and was one of the first countries to officially recognize the independence of Kyrgyzstan on December 21, 1991. Iran has made efforts to strengthen cooperation with Kyrgyzstan in various areas such as politics, economics, culture, science, and technology through bilateral relations and regional cooperation. In order to achieve this, Iran has adopted various foreign policy strategies towards the Republic of Kyrgyzstan. The aim of this study is to analyze the current foreign policy strategies of the Islamic Republic of Iran towards Kyrgyzstan and present potential scenarios for Iranian foreign policy in the country.
Research question: This study aims to answer the following questions: What are Iran's foreign policy strategies in Kyrgyzstan? What are the strengths and weaknesses of these strategies?
Research hypothesis: The proposed hypothesis is that Iran's foreign policy strategies towards Kyrgyzstan have not been successful and dynamic due to the country's internal strengths and environmental opportunities.
Methodology and theoretical framework: The present research aims to analyze the past and present strategies of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Kyrgyzstan by developing a conceptual model influenced by foreign policy analysis approaches and their governing principles. This will be followed by a forward-thinking approach to create potential and desirable scenarios for the Islamic Republic of Iran in this country. The conceptual model of the research will incorporate two strategic management models, namely Swat and Postel, as research techniques. The research approach will be a "futuristic" one, with a focus on scenarios. The main advantage of this conceptual model is its ability to simultaneously consider the micro, macro, and moderate levels, while using a futuristic approach to analyze the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Kyrgyzstan.
Results and discussion: Based on the drivers, trends, events, and images, the following scenarios can be envisioned for Iran's foreign policy in Kyrgyzstan: The first scenario: the no-surprise scenario: Possible revision: One of the most likely scenarios for Iran's foreign policy in Kyrgyzstan is the continuation of current trends without any major changes. This scenario falls under the category of static scenarios and involves maintaining the current level of bilateral relations. The second scenario can be referred to as either "the most likely optimal state" or the optimistic scenario:
This scenario predicts that with the implementation of the comprehensive ten-year contract between the two countries and the exploitation of many mines, the tourism and hydroelectric potential of the country, the strengthening of communication corridors, the benefits of the country's membership in the Eurasian Economic Union in relation to Iran, as well as Iran's permanent membership in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, the political, economic and cultural relations between the two countries will be promoted to the desired level.
The third scenario: "The worst-case scenario" or the pessimistic scenario: Due to the fact that currently Iran's relations with all the countries of the Central Asian region, including Kyrgyzstan, are not at an optimal level in relation to their strengths and the opportunities of the region, the possible unfavorable scenario is the continuation of the same trend along with the weakening of this relationship due to reasons such as the strong presence of China and other are competing countries.
Favorable or miracle scenarios: The removal of sanctions on Iran, the establishment of normalized relations with the international community, and Iran's permanent membership in the Shanghai Organization will have a significant impact on Iran's global influence, as well as the region and the country of Kyrgyzstan. This will greatly enhance the overall level of relations between all parties involved.
Conclusion: The study of Iran's foreign policy in Kyrgyzstan reveals that while political and cultural relations between the two countries were positive and amicable, economic relations were limited and at a low level. Based on the Swot and Pestel model, Iran's political strategy in Kyrgyzstan was aggressive, with a defensive economic strategy and a focus on cultural diversification. Various scenarios for the future of relations between the two countries can be analyzed, including optimistic ones, but other potential scenarios should also be considered. Ultimately, the research hypothesis can be confirmed that despite having strengths and opportunities, the two countries still have a long way to go in achieving an ideal relationship due to environmental weaknesses and challenges.

Keywords


Akrami, Rostam (2012), “A Comparative Study of the Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran Towards the Independent Muslim Republics in Central Asia and the Caucasus in the Governments of Mr. Khatami and Ahmadinejad”, Thesis Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran, [in Persian].
Benzaghta, Mostafa Ali, Abdulaziz Elwalda and Mousa Mohamed (2021), “SWOT Analysis Applications: An Integrative literature Review”, Journal of Global Business Insights, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 54-72, (doi.org/10.5038/2640-6489.6.1.1148).
Bojadjievska, Danevska (2022), “The Importance of Scenario Planning Functions for Company’s Performance in the Contemporary Environment”, InTraders International Trade Academic Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp.173-193, (doi: 10.55065/intraders.1143265).
Chen, Shu-Hsiang, Jaitip Nasongkhla, and Ana Donaldson (2018), “A Strategic Planning Process Model for Developing Open Educational Resources”, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 362-368, (Doi:10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.5.1064).
Cholpon, Kainazarova (2018), “New Trends in Kyrgyz Foreign Policy”, International Alatoo University in Kyrgyzstan, Available at: http:// New Trends in Kyrgyz Foreign Policy - Munich Personal RePEc Archive (uni-muenchen.de), (Accessed on: 23/05/2023).
Dalton, Jeff (2018), SWOT Analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats Analysis), Great Big Agile, Apress, Berkeley, CA, (doi :10.1007/978-1-4842-4206-3_62).
Daman Pak Jami, Morteza (2023), Economic Diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Central Asia, Tehran: Publications of the Center for Political and International Studies of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, [in Persian].
Dehshiri, Mohammad Reza, and Mehdi Taheri (2016), “Educational Diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Central Asia”, ‍Central Asia and The Caucasus Journal, Vol. 28, No. 119, pp. 42-1, Available at: http://ca.ipisjournals.ir/article_24260.html, (Accessed on: 11/06/2024),  [in Persian].
Fornasiero, Rosanna, Saskia Sardesai and Ana Cristina Barros (2021), Next Generation Supply Chains: A Roadmap for Research and Innovation, Switzerland: Cham, (doi:10.1007/978-3-030-63505-3).
 
Garbuzarova, Elena  (2020), “Iran’s Soft Power Tools in Kyrgyzstan”, Rudn Journal of Political Science, Vol. 22, No.  1, pp. 22-31, (doi:10.22363/2313-1438-2020-22-1-22-31).
Kapur, Radhika (2020), “Meaning and Significance of Culture”, Available at: http:// Meaning and Significance of Culture (Researchgate.net), (Accessed on: 23/05/2023).
Karami, Jahangir and Tahereh Daliran Chapeshloo (2016), “NGOs and Political Transformation in Central Asia (Case Study: Color Revolution in Republic of Kyrgyzstan), Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1, 95-114, (doi: 10.22059/jcep.2016.58575), [in Persian].
Kiani, Davood (2014), “Iran and Central Asia: A Cultural Perspective”, Iranian Review of Foreign Affairs, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 113-138, Available at: https://irfajournal.csr.ir/issue_16567_16951.html?lang=fa, (Accessed on: 11/06/2024), [in Persian].
Koolaee, Elaheh (2012), Politics and Government in Central Asia, Tehran: SAMT, [in Persian].
Kosow, Hannah and Robert Gabner (2008), “Methods of Future and Scenario Analysis Overview, Assessment, and Selection Criteria”, Bonn, Deutsches Institut for Entwicklungspolitik, Available at: https://www.idos-research.de/uploads/media/Studies_39.2008.pdf, (Accessed on: 23/05/2023).
Kreibich, Rolf (2007), “Understanding of Science and Methodology of Future Research”, Journal for Semiotics, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 177-198, (doi:10.2139/ssrn.2094215).
Mobini Dehkordi, Ali Salmanpour and Majid Khoei (2006), “Introduction to Strategic and Operational Planning”, Progressive Development, Vol. 2, No. 6, pp. 18, Available at: SID. https://sid.ir/paper/489572/fa, [in Persian].
Salavarzi Zadeh, Saleh, Saeed Vosoughi, Mohamad Ali Basiri and Enayatollah Yazdani (2020), “The Pathology of the "Futuristic" Foreign Policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran in Tajikistan Using SWOT and Pestel Models”, International Relations Researches, Vol. 10, No.1, 35-64, Available at: https://www.iisajournals.ir/article_111957.html, (Accessed on: 23/05/2023), [in Persian].
Sanaei, Mehdi (2011), Iran-Central Asian Relations: Trends and Prospects, Tehran: Department of Political and International Studies,  [in Persian].
Sanchez, Aurora, Nicoleta Cancelas and Beatriz Molina Serrano (2020), “Analysis of Port Sustainability Using the PPSC Methodology (PESTEL, Porter, SWOT, CAME)”, World Scientific News, Vol. 9, No.  146 , pp. 121-138, Available at: https://agro.icm.edu.pl/agro/element/bwmeta1.element.agro-26f002f7-cfba-426a-8e63-ff90d3aa7be9, (Accessed on: 11/06/2024). 
Sari, Yaşar (2017), “Foreign Policy of Kyrgyzstan under Askar Akayev and Kurmanbek Bakiyev”, Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 131-150, Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338487277_Foreign_Policy_of_Kyrgyzstan_Under_Askar_Akayev_and_Kurmanbek_Bakiyev, (Accessed on: 11/06/2024). 
Satarova, Eliana (2022),” Iran’s Foreign Policy Towards Central Asia: The Case of Kyrgyzstan”, Post-Soviet Issues, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 183-190, (doi: 10.24975/2313-8920-2022-9-2-183-190), (in Russ).
Tavalaei, Ruhollah (2015), “Futures Study of Iran’s Cyberspace Services Trends in the Technological Process of Globalization Using Delphi Method”, Strategic Studies of Public Policy, Vol. 5, No.17, pp. 92-123, Available at: https://sspp.iranjournals.ir/article_12743.html, (Accessed on: 11/06/2024), [in Persian].
Wallace, Vladyslav and Alejandro Rodriguez (2024), Kyrgyzstan in Crisis: A Geopolitical Juncture, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Available at: https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/kyrgyzstan-crisis-geopolitical-juncture, (Accessed on: 11/06/2024).
Wastnidge, Edward (2017), “Central Asia in the Iranian Geopolitical Imagination”, Cambridge Journal of Eurasian Studies, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 124-138, (doi: 10.22261/1YRJ04).
Zibakalam, Sadegh, Davod Afshary and Mohammad Karim Zadeh (2011), “A Study on the Reasons for Failure of the Government Emerged from the Developments Known as Tulip Revolution in Kyrgyzstan”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 4, No. 7, pp. 27-49, Available at: sid.ir/paper/151201/fa, (Accessed on: 11/06/2024), [in Persian].