The Role of Afghan Tradition in the Failure of Leftist Modernism in Afghanistan (1978-1992)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

10.22059/jcep.2024.377870.450227

Abstract

Introduction: Leftist modernism was experienced during the government of the People's Democratic Party (1978-1992) in Afghanistan. The leftist modernism had special characteristics during the ruling period of the People's Democratic Party.This model of modernism was influenced by Soviet models and relied on authoritarian policies and was violently implemented in Afghanistan. The government of the People's Democratic Party, especially the People's Party government, wanted to implement reforms quickly and not gradually. Another characteristic of left modernism in Afghanistan was its ideological nature. For the People's Democratic Party, especially the People's party government, modernization was not a goal, but a means to dominate and consolidate the party government in economic, social and cultural fields; Land reforms, literacy and women's participation in political and social life were the most important reform programs of the People's Democratic Party government. Meanwhile, land reform can be considered the most important reform program of the leftist government. This type of modernism had some success in modernizing Afghanistan, but it could not achieve its main goals. Various factors have contributed to the failure of leftist modernism. Afghan tradition has been one of the important factors in the failure of leftist modernism.
Research question: How did the Afghan tradition play a role in the failure of leftist modernism?
Research hypothesis: The essential contradiction of the indicators of the Afghan tradition with the leftist ideas and modernism caused its failure. Being Islamic, being ethnic, being historical, people's extreme sensitivity towards the private sphere, centrism, anti-government, and xenophobia can be counted among the important indicators of the Afghan tradition. The ideological de-traditionalization of left-wing modernism led to the promotion of tradition and intensified the conflict between tradition and modernity in Afghan society. With the onset of left modernism, the identity of the Afghan tradition was threatened. To defend its identity, tradition had to confront and was able to play different roles in the failure of this model of modernity.
Methodology and theoretical framework: In this article, the qualitative research method and the required data and information have been collected in documentary and library form.  The theoretical framework of this research is based on some basic modernization assumptions, such as the fact that development is an internal matter as well as a complex, gradual and evolutionary process, at the same time some of the ideas of late modernization including the possibility of interaction between tradition and modernity, the non-integral nature of development, and the necessity of paying attention to tradition in the development process.
Results and discussion: The Afghan traditions were able to play complex and multiple roles in the failure of the main programs of left modernism, such as land reforms, fight against illiteracy and women's participation and political and social freedom. In the first step, the Afghan tradition, as a "unified" force, united its guards and followers against leftism and leftist modernism. Despite the differences that existed among the leftist opposition forces, they all agreed that the leftist economic, cultural and social reforms, which had a socialist and secular nature, are against Islamic and traditional values and resistance to them is a religious and patriotic matter. The Afghan tradition was the motive to fight against leftist modernism.
Islam, as the main indicator and component of the Afghan tradition, aroused the feelings and motivations of the followers of this tradition, especially the villagers. They joined Islamic political parties (Jihadi Organizations) to fight against the leftist government and its reform programs. "Giving legitimacy" to the opposing forces of leftist modernism was another role of the Afghan tradition. The Sunni guardians were able to easily shape the mentality of the people among the people, especially in the villages, which were the main base of the Sunnah, in such a way that the people consider them to be right and the other party to be false.
The Afghan tradition played its role in a complex way in the defeat of the reform programs of the People's Democratic Party government. On the one hand, it gave legitimacy, motivation and unity to the followers and guardians of tradition, but on the other hand, it took away the legitimacy of the Afghan People's Democratic Party. In other words, the function of the Afghani tradition was completely positive for its adherents but completely negative for the executors of leftist modernism. During the implementation of leftist reforms, there were behaviors and actions of the leaders that evoked the Afghan tradition. The agents and implementers of land reforms in the villages did actions that were considered disrespectful to religion by the people. They did not respect local clerics and landowners, while these people had a lot of social influence in the villages, which is the main base and origin of the tradition. In addition, they used leftist literature that was not understandable for the villagers. Bringing women to literacy courses in villages was also in conflict with rural culture.
Conclusion: The findings of this research show that Afghan tradition played a very important role in the failure of leftist modernism. Unity, motivation and legitimization were the three roles played by the Afghan tradition in the fight against leftist reforms. The nature and characteristics of Afghani tradition were in complete contrast with the nature and characteristics of left modernism. For its survival, the Afghan tradition used all its power and strength in the fight against leftism and finally won. The reform experience of the People's Democratic Party can be important for the pro-modernist forces in Afghanistan. The Afghan tradition has always been victorious against different approaches of modernism. Therefore, the revival of tradition will have a negative effect on the process of Afghanistan’s modernization.
 

Keywords


Achievements of the April Revolution in Afghanistan (1984), Kabul: Information and Press Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs Afghanistan.
Andishmand, Mohammad Ikram (2009), People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan: Coup d'état, Sovereignty and Collapse (1978-1992), Kabul: Maiwand Publishing, [in Persian].
Ali Babaei, Yahya and Avazali Saadat (2014), "Elites and Failures of Modernization in Afghanistan", Social Cultural Marefat, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 125-145, Available at:  https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/1084204/, (Accessed on: 2/5/2024), [in Persian].
Alizadeh, Abdul Wahid, (2021), "Intellectual-Political Currents of Leftism in   Afghanistan", Rana, Vol. 1, No. 18, Available at: https:// www.research.ru.edu.af/en/doi/full/55/606c3efd73b/34, (Accessed on: 20/4/2024), [in Persian].
Ansari, Bashir Ahmad (2015), Tribal Mentality, California: Author Publishing, [in Persian].  
Arefi, Mohammad Akram and Rubineh Hamidi (2018), "The Role of Political Culture in Political Participation of Afghanistan (2001-2016)", Kateb Scientific-Research Quarterly, Vol. 5, No. 11, pp. 101-121, Available at: research.kateb.edu.af/dari/, (Accessed on: 25/4/2024), [in Persian].
Arianfar, Aziz (2006), Afghanistan in the Cyclone of History, Kabul: Maiwand Publishing, [in Persian]
Arnie, George (1988), Afghanistan; The Crossing of the Conquerors, Translated by Mohammad Yusuf Elmi and Habibur Rahman Halle, Peshawar: Maiwand Publishing, [in Persian].
Arnold, Anthony  (1985), Afghanistan's Two-Party Communism: Parcham and Khalq, Stanford: Stanford University.
Arvand, Atiq (2020), Socialism or Barbarism, Kabul: Amiri Publications, [in Persian].
Azkia, Mustafa (2002), Sociology of Development, 4th Edition, Tehran: Kalameh Publication, [in Persian].
Dietl, Wilhelm (1986), Afghanistan Passage, Translated by S­M­M Mohsenian, Mashhad: Cultural Deputy of Astan Quds Razavi, [in Persian].
Dupree, Louis (1980), Afghanistan, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Edwards, David B (2002), Before Taliban, Genealogies of the Afghan Jihad, Los Angeles: University of California Press.                                             
Fassihi, Amanullah (2017), “Modernity and Epistemic Secularization in Afghanistan”, Fourth International Congress of Islamic Humanities, Available at: https://icih.ir/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/6-5.pdf (Accessed on: 25/4/2024), [in Persian].
Giustozzi, Antonio (2007), War, Politics and Society in Afghanistan (1978-1992), Translated by Asadollah Shafahi, Tehran: Erfan Publications, [in     Persian].  
Glouhkoded, Vladimir (1981), The Economy of Afghanistan, Independent:   The Past and the Present, Moscow: Academy of Sciences of the USSR, [in French].
Gusfiled, Joseph R (1967), Tradition and Modernity: Misplaced Polarities in the Study of Social Change, New York: The American Journal of Sociology.
Huntington, Samuel (1987), Goals of Development, Washington: Weiner.
Keshtmand, Sultan Ali (2001), Political Notes and Historical Events, Vol. 1, 2, and 3, Unplaced: Najib the Great Publisher, [in Persian].
Khawati, Mohammad Shafaq (2011), “A Glimpse of the Intellectual and Political Currents of Afghanistan”, Regional Researches, No. 7, pp. 53-101, Available at: https://ensani.ir/fa/article/314385, (Accessed on: 10/5/2024), [in Persian].
Khosrowshahi, Seyed Hadi (1991), Islamic Movements of Afghanistan, Tehran: Bureau of International Political Studies, [in Persian].
Land and Water to Peasants (1984), Kabul: Enghelab Thor Newspaper, [in Persian].
Marsden, Peter (2001), Afghanistan: Minorities Conflict and the Search for Peace, Unplaced:  Minority Rights Group International Report.
Marsden, Peter (2015), Taliban, War, Religion and the New Order in Afghanistan, Translated by Kazem Piroozmand, Third Edition, the Ran Publishing Center, [in Persian].
Mashouf, Mir Mohammad Yaqoob (2018), The New Democratic Current: Sholay Javid (1965-2017), Kabul: Saeed Publications, [in Persian].
Mesbahzadeh, Seyyed Mohammad Baqir (2009), A Brief Political History of Afghanistan, Tehran: Marandiz Publishing, [in Persian].
Mir Mohammad Sadiq, ‌Farhang (2001), Afghanistan in the Last Five Centuries, Tehran: Erfan Publications, [in Persian].                                 
Misaq, Abdolkarim (1401), Memories, Conversations from the Past, Kabul: Amiri Publications, [in Persian].
Mousavi, Sayed Ali (2009), Analytical History of Afghanistan, from Zahir Shah to Hamid Karzai, Kabul: Balkh Press, [in Persian].
Pahlavan, Changiz (1992), “Points on the Society and Culture of Afghanistan Today”, Knick Wisdom, No. 55, Available at: https://ensani.ir/fa/article/258743/, (Accessed on: 8/5/2024), [in Persian].
Parenti، Christian (2012) ، “Rethinking the Communist Experiment in Afghanistan” ، Translated by Manouchehr Marzbanian، The Diplomatic World, Available at: https:ir.mondediplo.com/article1865.htm/, (Accessed on: 1/9/2012),   [in Persian].
Rahman, Tariq (1995), “Pashto Language and Identity Formation in Pakistan”, Contemporary South Asia, Vol. 4, No 2, pp. 151-170, (doi: 10.1080/09584939508719759). 
Rasouli, Yasin (2007), Traditional Response to Secularism in Afghanistan, Tehran: Erfan Publication, [in Persian].
Ray, Samirendra N. (2006), Modern Comparative Politics: Approaches, Methods and Issues: New Delhi: Prentice – Hall.
Razavi, Absar Hussain (1989), Afghanistan, Ten Years of Destruction and Tolerance, Islamabad: Hassan Razavi's Publisher, [in Persian].
Ritters, George (2014), Sociological Theory, Translated by Houshang Nayebi, Tehran: Ney's Publication, [in Persian].
Roa, Oliver (1990), Afghanistan, Islam and Political Modernism, Translated by Abolhassan Sarvqad Moghaddam, Mashhad: Cultural Deputy of Astan Quds Razavi, [in Persian].
Rustar Taraki, Mohammad Osman (1998), Sociological Power Structures in Afghanistan, Peshawar: Pashtun Culture and Customs Development Association, [in Persian].    
Saei, Ahmad (2015), Third World Political-Economic Issues, 16th Edition, Tehran: SAMT Publications, [in Persian].
Sajjadi, Abdolghayoum (2017), Political Sociology of Afghanistan, Third Edition, Kabul: Khatam Al-Nabin University Press, [in Persian].
Shafahi, Amanullah (2020), Leftism in Afghanistan, Kabul: Andisheh Foundation Publications, [in Persian].
Shahrani, Mohammad Nazif (2013), “Islam and Government in Afghanistan”, Translated by Abdul Khaliq Lalzad, KhorasanZamin, Available at: phd.read/php/etn.khorasanzameen.www//https (Accessed on: 25/10/2013), [in Persian].
Sistani, Mohammad Azam (1988), Land Relations and Approaches to the Land and Water Problem in Afghanistan (1984), Kabul: Publisher of the Center for Social Sciences of the Academy of the Republic of Afghanistan, [in Persian].
Soo, Alvin (2001), Social Change and Development, Translated by Mahmood Habibi Mazaheri, Tehran: Publication Institute for Strategic Studies, [in Persian]. 
Tanin, Zahir (2022), Afghanistan in the 20th Century, Second Edition, Tehran: Erfan, [in Persian].
Vaezi, Hamza (1999), "Afghanistan Crisis: Ethnicity, Challenges and Roots", Seraj, No. 18, Available at: https://ensani.ir/fa/article/270133/, (Accessed on: 11/05/2024), [in Persian].
Vaezi, Hamza (2002), Afghanistan and the Imperfect Structures of National Identity, Tehran: Erfan, [in Persian].          
Wiener, Myron (1976), Renovation of Society and a few Words about the Recognition of the Dynamics of Growth, Translated by Rahmatollah Maragheh and Others, Third Edition, Tehran: Pocket Book Publishing Company, [in Persian].