Developing and Validating a Model of Foreign Relations between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Azerbaijan Republic: Extraction of Risk, Critical, Strategic and Regulatory Variables

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph. D. Candidate in International Relations, Tehran Central Branch, Islamic Azad University

2 Assistant Professor, International Relations Department, Tehran Central Branch, Islamic Azad University

Abstract

Introduction: After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the South Caucasus became a battleground between regional powers and superpowers due to its rich energy resources, transit geopolitics, proximity to the Caspian Sea, and economic opportunities.  This strategic importance for Iran was greater than the fact that the region affects Iran's regional security and provides many economic opportunities for the country that can help lift economic sanctions. Foreign relations between Iran and the Republic of Azerbaijan are more critical between these countries. Research on the relationship between countries suffers from methodological gaps and shortcomings. Thus, this study attempts to cover these weaknesses and develop and validate a model of relationships between the countries.
Research Question: To achieve the objectives of the research, the following research questions have been developed: What are the main factors and variables of the structure of foreign relations between Iran and the Republic of Azerbaijan? What is the interaction and behavior of these variables in the system of bilateral relations and what is their nature?
Research Hypothesis: According to the research questions and objectives, the following hypotheses are proposed:

The developed model of Iran-Azerbaijan relations is a valid model that corresponds to environmental realities.
The validated model shows an acceptable fit index in SPSS.
The extracted variables can predict the future of foreign relations between the countries.

Methodology (and theoretical framework if available):
This study uses a multi-method, multi-step design that combines structural equation modeling (content analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis) in SPSS and interaction analysis in Mic Mac. In the first phase, a content analysis was carried out in which literature review, documentary research and semi-structured interviews with experts resulted in the extraction of 33 variables. Then confirmatory factor analysis was conducted and based on Eigen Value and Factor loading, 20 variables under five different factors were extracted and confirmed. In the second phase, a crossed impact analysis was done with experts in MicMac software according to which the behavior and nature of variables were identified and reported.    
The theoretical framework: The theoretical framework that guided the entire study from data collection to data analysis was the regional integrated security theory proposed and modified by Buzan and Waver (2003) Which is in stark contrast to traditional approaches in security studies and foreign relations because it has shifted attention from the global focus to the regional level. It has four main dimensions and covers the issues of border, polarity, anarchist structure, and social construction.
Results and discussion: The data showed that the valid model of foreign relations between countries has five major dimensions that include economy, survival and stability, hegemony, legal and political, and socio-cultural dimensions with twenty different variables at least. Cross-impact analysis where the identified variables are divided into impact variables (critical and environmental variables), two-dimensional variables (risk and target variables), dependent variables, and independent variables (exceptional and secondary-leverage variables).    
Conclusion: It was concluded that structural equation modeling could provide a robust and validated model of foreign relationships between Iran and Azerbaijan and explain these relations' direction and intensity in different dimensions.  It was also concluded that the constructed model shows indicators of a good fit with the geopolitical realities of the South Caucasus. These findings obtained in the interaction analysis can be used as a valid input for scenario development and forecasting of foreign relations between countries.

Keywords

References

Afzali, R, Seyyed Mohammad Seyyedi-Asl and Abolghasem, Mahmudi (2014), “Explanation of Relationships of Iran and Azerbaijan Republic with Constructivism Approac1”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 237-264. doi: 10.22059/jcep.2014.52977 [in Persian]
Balla, E (2013), “Turkish and Iranian Interests and Policies in the South Caucasus”, Norwegian peace building resource center. doi.org/10.4324/ 9781315143262
Buzan, B (1993), “From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School”, International Organization, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 327-352. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706979.
Buzan, B, Morten K, Pierre, Elzbieta T. and Ole, W (1990), “The European Security Order Recast: Scenarios for the Post-Cold War Era”, London: Pinter Publishers.
Buzan, B, Waever, O and Wilde, J (1998), “Security: A New Framework for Analysis”, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc.
Buzan, B and Waever, O (2003), “Regions and Power: The Structure of International Security”, New York, Cambridge University Press.
Chaboki, O (2010), “Challenges of Iran-Azerbaijan Relations”. Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 63-84. https://jcep.ut.ac.ir/article_20463.html [in Persian]
Chufrin, G. (2001), “The Security of the Caspian Sea Region”, London, Oxford University Press.
Coppieters, B (1996), “Contested Borders in the Caucasus”, Brussels, Vub Press.
Cornell, S; Star, S and Tsereteli, M (2015), “A Western Strategy for the South Caucasus”, Johns Hopkins University, Institute for Security and Development Policy.
Creswell, J.W, (2014), “Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches”, Thousand Oaks, Sage publications.
Davoodi, T (2016), “Friendly Relations between Iran and Azerbaijan: A Review”, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 7, No. 5, pp. 259-262. DOI:10.5901/mjss. 2016.v7n5p259.
Emin, M and Fatih, M (2019), “Iranian Relations with Azerbaijan and Armenia: A Comparative Approach in the Case of Pragmatist Politics”, Erzincan University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, Vol, 19, No. 1, pp. 157-176. https://dx.doi.org/10.11616/basbed.vi.487167
Erdag, R. (2017), “Regional Security Complex Theory and the Middle East and North Africa”, Palgrave, McMilan.
Gafarli, T (2020), “Iran’s Shifting Position on Nagorno-Karabakh”. TRT World research center. https://www.researchcentre.trtworld.com/info-packs/irans-shifting-position-on-nagorno-karabakh/
Gonabad, R. A. Fayaz, E. and Naderi, A. (2017), “Take a Look at the Barriers to Exporting the Islamic Revolution in the Middle East”, International Journal of Scientific Study, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 838-848. DOI: 10.17354/ijssI/2017/114.
Ismayilov, E. (2014), “Power, Knowledge, and Pipelines: Understanding the Politics of Azerbaijan’s Foreign Policy”, Caucasus Survey, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 79-129. DOI:10.1080/23761199.2014.11417304.
Kouhi Esfahani, M (2019), “Iran’s Foreign Policy in the South Caucasus: Relations with Azerbaijan and Armenia”, Durham, Routledge.
Maloney, S. (2002), “Identity and Change in Iran’s Foreign Policy”. In S. Telhami, & M. Barnett (Eds), “Identity and Foreign Policy in the Middle East” (pp. 88-116). London: Cornell University Press.
Nichol, J (2010), “Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia: Security Issues and Implications for U. S. Interests”, Congressional Research Service. www.everycrsreport.com/reports/RL30679.html.
Pallant, J (2020), “SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS”, London, McGraw Hill.
Paunic, N. (2016), “The Rising Shi’a Crescent: Iranian Smart Power and Implications for the Middle East, Central Asia, and the Persian Gulf”. Carleton Review of International Affairs, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 70-92. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.22215/cria. v3i0.120.
Peimani, H (2000), “Regional Security and the Future of Central Asia: The Competition of Iran, Turkey and Russia”, International Journal on World Peace, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 88-91. https://www.doi.org/10.4000/ abstractairanica.37287.
Rocca, N. M (2017), “Regional Stability for National Survival: Iran’s Foreign Policy towards the Southern Caucasus and Central Asia in the Post-Soviet Era”, International Relations and Diplomacy. Vol. 5, No. 9, pp. 544-553. DOI:10.17265/2328-2134/2017.09.003.
Rolfe, J (2008), “Regional Security for the Asia-Pacific: Ends and Means”, Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 101-112. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41220493.
Souleimanov, E, et al (2014), “Focused on Iran ? Exploring the Rationale Behind the Strategic Relationship between Azerbaijan and Israel”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. Vol. 13, No. 25, pp. 37-41. doi.org/10.1080/ 14683857.2014.967945.
Tabachnick, B. and Fidell, L. (2013),” Using Multivariate Statistics”, Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.
Valiyev. A.M (2012), “Azerbaijan-Iran Relations: Quo Vadis, Baku”, PONARS Eurasia Policy, Vol. 244, No. 1, pp. 1-6. https://www.ponarseurasia.org/wp-content/uploads/attachments/pepm_ 244_Valiyev_Sept2012-4.pdf.
Central Eurasia Studies
Volume 14, Issue 2
Autumn & Winter
March 2022
Pages 151-173

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics