دیپلماسی آب و اختلاف‌های آبی در منطقۀ آسیای مرکزی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه روابط بین‌الملل و مطالعات جهان، دانشکدۀ روابط بین‌الملل وزارت امورخارجه

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مطالعات منطقه‌ای، دانشکدۀ روابط بین‌الملل وزارت امورخارجه

چکیده

اتحاد شوروی در اواخر سدۀ بیستم فروپاشید و پانزده کشور جدید جایگزین آن شدند. از بین این کشورهای نواستقلال، پنج کشور، منطقۀ آسیای مرکزی را در همسایگی شمالی ایران تشکیل می‌دهند که از نظر فرهنگی و تاریخی از گذشته‌های دور با ایران و جهان اسلام ارتباط تنگاتنگی داشته‌اند. بعضی از این کشورها که در دورۀ اتحاد شوروی براساس مدیریت واحدی از سوی مسکو اداره می‌شدند، پس از استقلال به‌دلیل تضاد منافع دچار اختلاف‌هایی شده‌اند. یکی از این موارد اختلافی، مسئلۀ بهره‌برداری از آب‌های مشترک و فرامرزی است. به‌نظر می‌رسد براساس نظریۀ واقع‌گرایی تدافعی، اقدام‌ها و رفتارهای کشورهای این منطقه و سیاست خارجی آن‌ها ‌در برابر یکدیگر و در زمینۀ آب قابل توضیح است؛ زیرا وقتی یکی از کشورهای منطقۀ آسیای مرکزی در بهره‌برداری از منابع آب مشترک و فرامرزی شروع به اقدام‌های یک‌جانبه می‌کند، کشورهای دیگر که از بابت این اقدام‌ها احساس تهدید می‌کنند، دست به موازنۀ تهدید و اقدام‌های متقابل می‌زنند. البته در دورۀ استقلال جمهوری‌های آسیای مرکزی، نهادهایی در زمینۀ دیپلماسی آب در این منطقه‌ ایجاد شده‌اند؛ اما این نهادهای منطقه‌ای کارایی درخور توجهی نداشته‌اند و نتوانسته‌اند در کاهش اختلاف‌های آبی موجود بین کشورهای این منطقه نقش چندانی ‌ایفا کنند. این نوشتار به‌دنبال پاسخ‌گویی به این پرسش است که چرا دیپلماسی آب در منطقۀ آسیای مرکزی از موفقیت لازم برخوردار نبوده است و بر این باور است که دلیل این موفق‌نبودن، احساس تهدید امنیتی است که کشورهای این منطقه نسبت به یکدیگر دارند و دیپلماسی آب هم در ‌‌تأثیر این نگرانی‌های امنیتی قرار گرفته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Water Diplomacy and Water Disputes in the Central Asian Region

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyyed Ali Mahmoudi 1
  • Hamed Hekmat Ara 2
1 Associate Professor of International Relations, International Relations School of Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Islamic Republic of Iran
2 M.A. Student of Regional Studies, International Relations School of Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Islamic Republic of Iran
چکیده [English]

Water plays an important role in Central Asia. This area is more than 4 million square kilometers of breadthwhich includes Post-Soviet Republics of Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Turkmenistan and covers more than Indian Subcontinent’s breadth and has a population of about 60 million people. Due to the fact that Central Asian is located in a dry and semi-arid belt, agriculture would be possible through irrigation and it is not expected to produce dried crops. As a result, artificial water distribution systems are needed. In the late nineteenth century with the conquest of all parts of Central Asia by the Russian Empire, new water distribution systems for flax production were carried out on a wider scale than in comparison with the past. As a result the seemingly endless Central Asian Water Resources began to decline from 1960s when the rapid increase in demand for water started by drainage of rivers and reducing groundwater resources, as well as degradation of water and soil quality. The drying of “Aral Lake” is also the result of the same Water Management policies that were adopted during the Soviet Era.
Agriculture is a reasonable point for Central Asian Economy and products such as flax and rice need plenty of water and irrigation. In addition, irrigation systems in the area have been severely eroded; so half of the water resources never flow to the farm lands and goes to spits. Several years of drought has also taken place in the area and is still likely to happen again. But due to political and economic rivalries between the countries of the region, they have not been able to agree on a replacement system instead of the Soviet Era Water Resources Management System. After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the change in natural resources management in each Central Asian Autonomous Republics occurred .The result of this historic event was the rivalry over water resources which were alarmingly increasing in the region and were leading to potential tensions in Central Asian republics. Therefore the political climate became tense. Water Pricing will save this problem. In Central Asian Region, water should be distributed with market prices by eliminating water subsidies which was a legacy of the Soviet Union era.
In Central Asia, given that most of the region’s water surfaces originate from Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, the two countries apply stringent water abstraction systems while the downstream countries which include Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan, naturally feel threatened by the two upstream countries and try to counter the threats. But the disagreements that exist between the downstream countries on water distribution prevent these countries from uniting and cooperating with each other against the upstream countries. In fact, all countries of Central Asian Region feel threatened by each other and choose their allies from trans-region. As Kazakhstan and Russia, both worried about Uzbekistan’s threats (Kazakhstan is competing with Uzbekistan and Russia over the leadership of the region due to its lack of presence in Uzbekistan) and united with each other.
The main question of the article is why Water Diplomacy between the countries of Central Asian states, despite cultural, linguistic, religious and geographical proximities with each other, has not been successful so far, that these countries have adopted less cooperative regional approaches to water issues and each one seeks to find trans-regional allies? The answer to this question based on “Defensive Realism Theory” is that the issue of water along with ethnic and border disputes have become a security issue in relations between the countries of Central Asia, because of the threat the feel from each other and seek to find trans-regional allies which have common benefits for them. Therefore, due to the fact that Water Diplomacy in Central Asian Region is not inherent in origin and is influenced by border and ethnic disputes, as a result, it has not been successful in resolving regional conflicts.
Regarding the dependence of most Central Asian states economy to common and trans- boundary waters, the issue of Water Management is of a great importance in the region. Water Diplomacy in Central Asia after the independence of the countries of the region in February 1992 was manifested in the framework of an “Almaty Agreement” between all Central Asian states which demanded maintenance of allocation of Water Resources from the Soviet time. In 2008, Kazakhstan’s president as a downstream country, as well as Tajikistan’s and Kyrgyzstan Presidents, as upstream countries agreed on a plan of exchanging water and energy; But Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan, which were dependent on Water Resources of upstream countries, demanded the maintenance of the Almaty Agreement and their previous status in the Soviet era and did not attend the meeting. The reason for Kazakhstan’s agreement is the large breadth of the country and its lack of dependence to “Syr Darya”. Of course, with the change of ruling government in Uzbekistan, the country has welcomed negotiations on water resources and even supported the development of water facilities in Tajikistan.
The downstream countries of Central Asian Region including Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan were defined by agriculture in the Soviet era due to their ferry lands; so much of Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan’s water was transferred to these countries after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Based on Defensive Realism Theory, all states seek to preserve their past position and their main behavior in foreign policy is the balance of threats against theose states that threaten their position. Although all of downstream countries in the region feel threatened by upstream countries in the context of water, there are some disagreements among these countries. They cannot unite against a common threat and in fact no kind of strong cooperation agreement at the level of the Central Asian Region can be formed among them. Therefore, the countries of the region are looking for trans-regional allies and the disagreement over common water resources (due to the regional water crisis) alongside ethnic and border disputes have become one of the main reasons for the divergence of the countries of the Central Asian Region.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Central Asia
  • Common Water Resources
  • Trans-boundary Rivers
  • Water Diplomacy
  • Water Disputes
A) English
1. Chikalova, Lidiya (2016), “Climate Change as a Political Threat Multiplier in Central Asia”, Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, Available at: http://www.osce-academy.net/upload/file/36BRIEFNEW.PDF, (Accessed on: 18/6/2018).
2. Dalbaeva, Alina (2018), “End the Weaponisation of Water in Central Asia”, Crisis Group Commentary, Available at: http://www.crisisgroup.org/europe-central-asia/central-asia/kazakhstan/end-weaponisation-water-central-asia, (Accessed on: 18/4/2018).
3. Economic Commission for Europe (2009), “Capacity for Water Cooperation in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia”, Available at: https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/env/water/documents/CWC%20publication%20joint%20bodies.pdf, (Accessed on: 27/5/2018).
4. European Commission External Relations (2011), “EU Action on Water Resources in Central Asia as a Key Element of Environmental Protection”, Available at: http://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/eu_action_on_water_ resources_in_central_asia_0.pdf, (Accessed on: 25/4/2018).
5. European Strategic Intelligence and Security Center (ESISC) (2009), “Central Asia the Battle over Water”, Available at: http://www.esisc.org/publications/ analyses/central-asia-the-battle-over-water, (Accessed on: 25/5/2018).
6. FAO (2016), “One-Page Summary of Long-Term Average Annual Renewable Water Resources”, Available at: http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/ water_res/index.stm, (Accessed on: 13/4/2018).
7. Goldman, Michael (2007), “How ‘Water for All!’ Policy Became Hegemonic: the Power of the World Bank and its Transnational Policy Networks”, Geoforum, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 786-800.
8. Klötzli, Stefan (1994), “The Water and Soil Crisis in Central Asia: a Source for Future Conflicts?”, Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zurich, Available at: http://www.css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/The_Water_and_Soil_Crisis_1994.pdf, (Accessed on: 13/6/2018).
9. Madramootoo, Chandra and Victor Dukhovny (2008), Water and Food Security in Central Asia, Tashkent: NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Socio-Economic Stability and Water Productivity: Food and Water Security in Central Asia.
10. Mosello, Beatrice (2008), “Water in Central Asia: a Prospect of Conflict or Cooperation?”, Journal of Public and International Affairs, Vol. 19, pp. 151-174.
11. Sievers, Eric W. (2002), “Water, Conflict, and Regional Security in Central Asia”, New York University Environmental Law Journal, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 356-402.
12. Spoor, Max (1998), “The Aral Sea Basin Crisis: Transition and Environment in Former Soviet Central Asia”, Development and Change, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 409-435.
13. United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) (2005), Regional Assessment 24: Aral Sea. GIWA Regional Assessment, Kalmar: University of Kalmar on Behalf of UNIT.
14. United Nations (UN) (2017), “Total Population by Region, Subregion and Country, Annually for 1950-2100 (Thousands)”, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Available at: https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/DVD/Files/ 1_Indicators%20(Standard)/EXCEL_FILES/1_Population/WPP2017_POP_F01_1_TOTAL_POPULATION_BOTH_SEXES.xlsx, (Accessed on: 14/5/2019).
15. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2012), “Promoting IWRM and Fostering Transboundary Dialogue in Central Asia”, Available at: https://info.undp.org/docs/pdc/Documents/SVK/00056531_ENV-IWRM%20CA%202009-2012.pdf, (Accessed on: 23/6/2018).
16. Vajpeyi, Dhirendra K. (2012), Water Resource Conflicts and International Security: a Global Perspective, Lanham: Lexington Books.
17. Walt, Stephen M. (1985), “Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power”, International Security, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 3-43.
18. Walt, Stephan (1987), The Origins of Alliance, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
19. Walt, Stephen (1988), “Testing Theories of Alliance Formation: the Case of Southwest Asia”, International Organization, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 275-316.
20. World Lake Databace (n.d.), “Aral Sea Basin”, Available at: http://wldb.ilec.or.jp.s3-website-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com/gis_map/ asi241-01.jpg, (Accessed on: 16/5/2019).
 
B) Persian
1. Amirhahmadian, Bahram and Mahdi Naseri (2013), “Central Asian Water Crisis: Emphasizing the Controversy of the Countries of the Region on Water Issues”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 6, No. 12, pp. 1-20.
2. Araghchi, Seyed Abbas (2015), Trans-Boundary Waters and International System, Tehran: Publishing office of Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
3. Griffiths, Martin (2009), Encyclopedia of International Relations and World Politics, Translated by Alireza Tayyeb, Tehran: Ney.
4. Kasaee, Alireza (2004), “Central Asia’s Crisis of Water and the Turning Point in Foreign Policy”, Central Asia and the Caucasus Studies, Vol. 4, No. 48, pp. 213-234.
5. Moshirzadeh, Homeira (2006), The Evolution of the Theories of International Relations, Tehran: Samt.
6. O’Hara, Sarah (2000), “Water Situation in the Central Asian Region”, Translated by Abbas Rasouli, Central Asia and the Caucasus Studies, No. 30, pp. 165-181.
7. Papoli Yazdi, Mohammad Hossein and Fatemeh Vosughi (2011), Iran Water Diplomacy (Hydrogeopolitic), Mashhad: Papoli Publications.
8. Rajabi Hashjin, Mehdi and Davoud Reza Arab (2006), “Water Poverty Index; Efficient Tool for Assessing the Status of Global Water Resources”, Iran Water Resources Management Conference, Isfahan.
9. Torabi, Qasem (1999), “Threat Balance: Balance of Powers or Alliance with Threatening Party”, Strategic Information Monthly, No. 74, pp. 41-48.
 
C) Russian
1. Национальный Статистический Комитет (1999), “Итоги Первой Национальной Переписи Населения Кыргызской Республики”, Available at: https://docplayer.ru/36485005-Nacionalnyy-statisticheskiy-komitet-kyrgyzskoy-respubliki-itogi-pervoy-nacionalnoy-perepisi-naseleniya-kyrgyzskoy-respubliki-1999-goda.html, (Accessed on: 8/5/2018).
2. Нацстаткомитета Кыргызской Республики (2010), “Перепись Населения и Жилищного Фонда Кыргызской Республики 2009 года”, Available at: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/meetings/wshops/Belarus_8Dec08/docs/Countries/Kyrgyzstan-PHC_2009.pdf, (Accessed on: 26/6/2018).