نقش سرمایۀ‌ اجتماعی در افزایش غرور ملی شهروندان قزاقستان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار علوم سیاسی گروه معارف اسلامی، دانشکدۀ الهیات و معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

2 دانش آموختۀ دکتری علوم سیاسی، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

چکیده

یکی از منابع هویت‌بخشی شهروندان، غرور ملی است که در کشورهای درحال‌توسعه اهمیت زیادی دارد. قزاقستان یکی از کشورهای درحال‌توسعه در آسیای مرکزی است که مهم‌ترین و بزرگ‌ترین آنها در منطقه به­ شمار می‌آید. این کشور در حالی در پایان سال 1991 به استقلال رسید که اقلیت‌های قومی و مذهبی مختلفی داشت، ولی با وجود آن، سال‌ها از ثبات سیاسی و اجتماعی خوبی برخوردار بوده است، هرچند که رویدادهای ژانویۀ ۲۰۲۲ از بی‌ثباتی اجتماعی و سیاسی شدید در این کشور خبر داد. در این زمینه، نتایج پیمایش ارزش‌های بین‌المللی نیز نشان می‌دهد که شهروندان این کشور غرور ملی به‌نسبت بالایی دارند (میانگین 40/3). این پرسش مطرح است که سرمایۀ اجتماعی به‌عنوان مفهومی نوین در علم سیاست، چه تأثیری بر افزایش غرور ملی شهروندان کشور قزاقستان داشته است. این نوشتار به شیوۀ کمی و با استفاده از تحلیل ثانویه داده‌های آماری پیمایش ارزش‌های جهانی انجام شده است. با تقسیم سرمایۀ اجتماعی به پنج مؤلفه، نتایج نشان داد که سه مؤلفۀ سرمایۀ اجتماعی یعنی اعتقاد به اهمیت دموکراسی در جامعه، اعتماد سیاسی و عضویت در انجمن‌های اجتماعی در تقویت غرور ملی شهروندان قزاقستانی تأثیر مثبتی داشته‌ و سبب تقویت غرور ملی در میان شهروندان این کشور شده‌است. یافته‌های نویسندگان نشان می‌دهد تأثیر اعتماد اجتماعی تعمیم‌یافته و ارزش‌های دینی بر غرور ملی شهروندان قزاقستانی معنا‌دار نبود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Role of Social Capital in Promoting the Kazakh Citizens’

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyed Morteza Noei Baghban 1
  • Zahra Sadeghi Naghdali 2
1 Assistant Professor of Political Science, Department of Islamic Education, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
2 Ph.D. in Political Sociology, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: National pride is one of the sources of citizens’ identity; therefore, it is very important in developing countries. As a developing country, Kazakhstan is one of the most necessary and important countries in Central Asia. This country gained independence in 1991 with good political and social stability. In this regard, the results of international values ​​survey also show that the citizens of this country have relatively high national pride (mean=3.40). Based on this, the aim of this research is to investigate the impact of social capital as a new concept in political science on the national pride of Kazakh citizens in recent years. This research has been done quantitatively using the secondary analysis of statistical data of "The World Values Survey" (WVS). After dividing social capital into five components, the results showed that three components of social capital, belief in the importance of democracy in society, political trust and membership in social associations, have a positive effect on strengthening the national pride of Kazakh citizens. The findings show that the effect of generalized social trust and religious values on the national pride of Kazakh citizens was not significant.
Questioning the identity of people and societies is one of the most important intellectual issues of mankind throughout history. In this regard, the national pride is a concept close to national identity. One of the regions where national pride has become very important in recent years is Central Asia.
With the collapse of the former Soviet Union, five countries emerged in Central Asia, the largest of which is Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan tried to separate its political and administrative system from Russia. Of course, creating and producing identity and expecting its legitimacy in society is a natural thing; one cannot simply act vertically and from top to bottom. In other words, in order to succeed in this matter, it is necessary for the norms, values and customs and social networks and links to help the governments and help them in reproducing their national identity. In this regard, the present study was conducted with the aim of investigating the effect of some elements of social capital on increasing the feeling of national pride in Kazakh citizens.
Research Question: How do the different components of social capital effect on the development of national pride among Kazakh citizens?
Research Hypothesis: Improving social trust, increasing social norms and social networks and relationships have positive effects on national pride among Kazakh citizens.
Methodology and Theoretical Framework: The methodology of this research is quantitative and based on secondary analysis. The statistical population of this study is all regions of Kazakhstan. The data used to test the research hypotheses were extracted from the WVS Wave 7 dataset (2017-2020). The sample size in this research is 1276 people. Volchok and Narayan believe that the reduction of capital and social bonds in societies weakens the will of individuals to defend their identity and collective interests. In other words, it can be claimed that the nature of social identities requires the expansion of social relations and solidarity, whether mechanical or organic. Considering why social capital has a positive effect on citizens’ national identity, Ikeda et al, argue that the expansion of face-to-face interactions and strengthening of the collective spirit in community creates better feelings toward the community among citizens. From this point of view, social bonds reinforce valued norms and mutual relationships experienced by individuals, which creates a sense of altruism in society. This research tries to test the hypotheses by using Putnam’s (2000) theory and his division of social capital into three components of social trust, social norms, and social networks.
Results and Discussion: After dividing social capital into five components, the results showed that the three components of social capital, the belief in the importance of democracy in society, political trust and membership in social associations, had a positive effect on strengthening the national pride of Kazakh citizens. The findings show that the effect of generalized social trust and religious values on the national pride of Kazakh citizens is not significant.
Conclusion: The results show that the citizens of Kazakhstan have a high sense of pride toward their country and an average of 3.40 for the variable of national pride of Kazakh citizens confirms this issue. A recent wave of WVS data ​​ shows that more than 90 percent of Kazakhstani citizens are very proud of their country. This is important because, firstly, Kazakhstan has only been independent for about twenty-one years. Also, various ethnic and religious minorities live in this country which is usually challenging to form a national identity. The results show that even the Russian minority living in Kazakhstan, who are citizens of this country are very proud of their country and are considered a part of the country’s history (average national pride for the Russian minority in Kazakhstan 24 / 3, which is higher than the average of 2.5). The results also show that this variable, i.e., social capital, explains about 10% of strengthening national pride. Considering that various causes and factors affect the phenomena of humanities and especially political science, this level of explanation of national pride by the variable of social capital is completely acceptable.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • World Values Survey Data
  • Social Capital
  • National Pride
  • National Identity
  • Central Asia
  • Kazakhstan
Ataei, Farhad (2009), “National Identity and Nation-Orientation in Central Asia”, Journal of Rights and Political Sciences, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 189-204,  Available at: https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/454203, (Accessed on: 11/5/ 2021), [in Persian].
Bourdieu, Pierre (1983), Forms of Social Capital, In: Richards JC (ed) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Greenwood Press, New York.
Chalabi, Masoud (1997), Sociology of Order: Theoretical Explanation and Analysis of Social Order, Tehran: Ney Publication, [in Persian].
Chalupnicek, Pavel (2010), “The CAPITAL is Social Capital: An Austrian Perspective”, Am J Econ Sociol, Vol. 69, No. 4, pp. 1230-1250, Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20788964, (Accessed on: 15/5/2021).
Coleman, James (1990), Foundations of Social Theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Etzioni, Amitai (1993), The Spirit of Community, The Reinvention of American Society, New York: Simon & Schuster.
Fukuyama, Francis (1995), Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity, Free Press.
Galston, William (2007), “Civic Knowledge, Civic Education, and Civic Engagement: A Summary of Recent Research”, International Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 30, No. 6, pp. 623-642, (doi:10.1080/ 01900690701215888).
Ghawam, Abdoali and Neda Muhammad (2011), “The Crisis of National Identity and the Gap Between State and Nation in Globalization Period, the Impact of Language and Religion on National Identity in Tajikistan and Kazakhstan”, Journal of International Relations Studies, Vol. 3, No. 12, pp. 229-260, Available at: http://prb.iauctb.ac.ir/article_524300.html, (Accessed on: 5/7/2021), [in Persian].
Hajiani, Ibrahim (2001), “National Pride in Iran and a Few hypothesis”, Journal of National Studies, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 193-228, Available at: http://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20110207160645-0%20(6).pdf, (Accessed on: 11/5/2021), [in Persian].
Hashemianfar, Ali, Mina Jalali and Zia Hashemi (2011), “A Reflection on What National Pride is and Some Factors Affecting it in the Study of Isfahan City”. Journal of Historical Sociology, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 23-50, Available at: https://jhs.modares.ac.ir/article-25-8274-fa.html, (Accessed on: 2/12/2021), [in Persian].
Hashemianfar, Ali, Zia Hashemi and Mina Jalali  (2012), “National Pride and the Impacts of Social and Cultural Factors on It, Case Study: Isfahan”, Journal of Social and Cultural Strategy, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 147-169,  Available at: https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/magazine/number/75038, (Accessed on: 23/11/2021), [in Persian].
Hutchinson, John and Anthony Smith (1994), Nationalism, Oxford Readers, Oxford: OUR.
Ikeda, Ken’ichi and Richery Sean (2009), “The Impact of Diversity in Informal Social Networks on Tolerance”, British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 655-658, (doi:10.1017/S0007123408000574).
Kramer, Roderick and Marilynn Brewer (1984), “Effects of Group Identity on Resource Use in a Simulated Commons Dilemma”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 1044-1057, (doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46. 5.1044).
Kundakbayeva, Zhnat (2021), The History of Kazakhstan from the Earliest Period to the Present time, Litres.
Mead, George (1964), On Social Psychology: Selected Papers, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Iman, Muhammad Taghi and Ali Roohani (2014),“ A Survey of the Relation Between National Identity and Social Interest, Case Study: Students of Shiraz University”, Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. 7, No. 22, pp. 37-62,   Available at: http://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20140521165851-9861-48.pdf, (Accessed on 1/12/2021), [In Persian].
Naroll, Raoul (1983), The Moral Order, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Oskarsson, Sven (2003), “Institutional Explanations of Union Strength: An Assessment”, Politics and Society, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 609-645,  (doi: 10.1177/ 0032329203256955).
Paxton, Pamela (1999), “Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 105, No. 1, pp. 88-127, (doi:10.1086/210268).
Polonskaya, Ludmola and Alexi Malashenko (2008), Islam in Central Asia, Ithaca Press.
Putnam, Robert (2000), Bowling Alone-The Collapse and Revival of American Community, Simon and Schuster, New York.
Putnam, Robert (1993), “The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life”, The American Prospect, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 35042, Available at: http://www. prospect. Org/print/vol/13, (Accessed on: 3/ 7/ 2021).
Rothstein, Bo (2005), Social Traps and the Problem of Trust, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Soltani, Alireza and Zohreh Khanmohammadi (2021), “Russia's National Identity in the Post-Soviet Era; Change or Continuity”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 177-200, (doi:10.22059/jcep.2022.331352.450032). [in Persian].
Transue, John (2007), “Identity Salience, Identity Acceptance, and Racial policy Attitudes: American National Identity as a Uniting Force”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 78-91, (doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007. 00238.x).
Triandis, Harry, Kwok Leung, Marcelo Villareal and Felicia Clack (1985), “Allocentric Versus Idiocentric Tendencies: Convergent and Discriminant Validation”, Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 395-415, (doi:10.1016/0092-6566(85)90008-X).

Vosoughi, Saeid and Asgar Safari (2017), “Kazakhstan’s Role in the Development of Relations between Iran and China in Central Asia”, Central Eurasia Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 467-484, (doi:10.22059/jcep.2018.209451.449654) [in Persian].

Woolcock, Michael and Deepa Narayan (2000), “Social Capital: Implications for Development Theory, Research, and Policy”, The World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 225-249, (doi:10.1093/wbro/15.2.225).
Yemelianova, Galina (2014), “Islam, National Identity and Politics in Contemporary Kazakhstan, Asian Ethnicity, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 286-301, (doi:10.1080/14631369.2013.847643).
Yilmaz, Harun (2022), Nations and Nationalism in the Soviet Union: Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan and Ukraine, Taylor & Francis.
Zahiri, Alireza (2007), “Quiddity of National Identity”, Journal of Political Sciences, Vol. 8, No. 29, pp. 29-50,   Available at: http://psq.bou.ac.ir/article_11719_5ec20df739619288e5213125d23b3a82.pdf, (Accessed on: 10/6/2021) [in Persian].
Zhiyenbayeva, N. B., R. B. Abdrakhmanova, A. E. Abdrakhmanov, O. B. Tapalova, K. Samal, and U. Elmira (2013), “Experimental Study of Teenager's Ethnic Identity”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 89, pp. 939-943, (doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.960).